Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of Intracoronary Acetylcholine Infusion and Acetylcholine Bolus Injection Protocols During Invasive Coronary Function Testing
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: August 18, 2016
Janneke Woudstra1, Rutger G T Feenstra1, Caitlin E M Vink1
1Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC Heart Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Invasive coronary function testing for coronary artery spasm (CAS) and endothelial dysfunction (CED) showed similar diagnostic yields using 3-minute infusion versus 1-minute bolus acetylcholine protocols. Including T-wave abnormalities improved CAS diagnosis consistency.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Testing
- Vascular Physiology
Background:
- Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) and coronary artery spasm (CAS) are key causes of angina in patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries.
- Invasive coronary function testing (ICFT) using acetylcholine (ACh) is the standard diagnostic method for CED and CAS.
- Optimizing ICFT protocols is crucial for accurate diagnosis and patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic yield of a 3-minute ACh infusion versus a 1-minute ACh bolus injection protocol for diagnosing CED and CAS.
- To evaluate the impact of including T-wave abnormalities in the diagnostic criteria for CAS.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study of 220 patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries undergoing ICFT.
- Patients were divided into two groups: 110 received a 3-minute ACh infusion, and 110 received a 1-minute ACh bolus injection.
- Coronary blood flow and vasoconstriction were measured using Doppler flow, with CED and CAS diagnosed based on established criteria (COVADIS).
Main Results:
- The prevalence of CED was similar between the 3-minute infusion and 1-minute bolus protocols (78% vs 79%, p=0.869).
- The 3-minute infusion protocol diagnosed the equivocal endotype of CAS less frequently than the 1-minute bolus protocol (24% vs 44%, p=0.004).
- Including T-wave abnormalities in the CAS diagnosis yielded comparable results between the two protocols, reducing the difference in equivocal diagnoses.
Conclusions:
- Both 3-minute ACh infusion and 1-minute bolus injection protocols demonstrate similar diagnostic yields for CED.
- The 1-minute bolus protocol is recommended for clinical practicality, with the inclusion of T-wave abnormalities essential for consistent CAS diagnosis.
- Standardizing CAS diagnostic criteria, including T-wave abnormalities, enhances the reliability of ICFT.
Abstract:
Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) and coronary artery spasm (CAS) are causes of angina with no obstructive coronary arteries in patients. Both can be diagnosed by invasive coronary function testing (ICFT) using acetylcholine (ACh). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of a 3-minute ACh infusion as compared with a 1-minute ACh bolus injection protocol in testing CED and CAS. We evaluated 220 consecutive patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries who underwent ICFT using continuous Doppler flow measurements. Per protocol, 110 patients were tested using 3-minute infusion, and thereafter 110 patients using 1-minute bolus injections, because of a protocol change. CED was defined as a <50% increase in coronary blood flow or any epicardial vasoconstriction in reaction to low-dose ACh and CAS according to the Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS) criteria, both with and without T-wave abnormalities, in reaction to high dose ACh. The prevalence of CED was equal in both protocols (78% vs 79%, p = 0.869). Regarding the endotypes of CAS according to COVADIS, the equivocal endotype was diagnosed less often in the 3 vs 1-minute protocol (24% vs 44%, p = 0.004). Including T-wave abnormalities in the COVADIS criteria resulted in a similar diagnostic yield of both protocols. Hemodynamic changes from baseline to the low or high ACh doses were comparable between the protocols for each endotype. In conclusion, ICFT using 3-minute infusion or 1-minute bolus injections of ACh showed a similar diagnostic yield of CED. When using the COVADIS criteria, a difference in the equivocal diagnosis was observed. Including T-wave abnormalities as a diagnostic criterion reclassified equivocal test results into CAS and decreased this difference. For clinical practice, we recommend the inclusion of T-wave abnormalities as a diagnostic criterion for CAS and the 1-minute bolus protocol for practicality.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for...
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics

