Cutting guides in mandibular tumor ablation: Are we as accurate as we think?

Tumor margin status is critical in local tumor recurrence and is a significant prognostic factor in head and neck cancer survival. With the introduction of computer-assisted surgical planning, one of the main challenges is the accurate positioning of the surgical cutting guide but there is limited evidence of the accuracy of the 3D cutting guides in mimicking virtually planned osteotomy. This study evaluates the accuracy of osteotomy lines produced by 3D-printed cutting guides and assesses the overall accuracy of mandibular reconstruction.

The pre and postoperative 3D models were aligned using an automated surface registration feature based on the iterative closest point algorithm. The differences in osteotomy line deviation, linear and angle measurements, and 3D volume quantification of the pre and post models were measured.

We included 14 patients (8 men and 6 women with ages ranging from 13 to 75 years) with a segmental mandibular resection who met all of the inclusion criteria. The smallest defect size was 4.4 cm, the largest defect was 12.2 cm, and the average was 7.30 cm +/- 2.80 cm. The average deviation between virtually planned osteotomy and actual surgical osteotomy was 1.52 +/-1.02 mm. No covariates were associated with increased inaccuracy of the 3D-printed cutting guides.

The finding of this study suggests that virtual surgical planning is an unambiguous paradigm shift in the predictability of the surgical plan and achievement of the reconstruction goals. The 3D-printed cutting guides are a very accurate and reliable tool in translating virtual ablation plans to an actual surgical resection margin.