Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving the reliability of small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering measurements of anisotropic precipitates in metallic alloys using sample rotation.

Journal of applied crystallography·2024
Same author

Influence of device configuration and noise on a machine learning predictor for the selection of nanoparticle small-angle X-ray scattering models.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances·2024
Same author

Nano-oxides boost aluminium heat resistance.

Nature materials·2024
Same author

Highly stable coherent nanoprecipitates via diffusion-dominated solute uptake and interstitial ordering.

Nature materials·2022
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Assembly and Characterization of Polyelectrolyte Complex Micelles
08:44

Assembly and Characterization of Polyelectrolyte Complex Micelles

Published on: March 2, 2020

10.7K

Automated selection of nanoparticle models for small-angle X-ray scattering data analysis using machine learning.

Nicolas Monge1, Alexis Deschamps2, Massih Reza Amini3

  • 1Xenocs, Grenoble, France.

Acta Crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and Advances
|February 29, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a machine learning algorithm for automatic nanoparticle model selection in small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data. The algorithm efficiently identifies the best model, simplifying analysis for researchers.

Keywords:
SAXSdata analysismachine learningmodel selectionnanoparticlessmall-angle X-ray scattering

More Related Videos

Contrast-Matching Detergent in Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Experiments for Membrane Protein Structural Analysis and Ab Initio Modeling
10:27

Contrast-Matching Detergent in Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Experiments for Membrane Protein Structural Analysis and Ab Initio Modeling

Published on: October 21, 2018

12.4K
Combining X-Ray Crystallography with Small Angle X-Ray Scattering to Model Unstructured Regions of Nsa1 from S. Cerevisiae
09:15

Combining X-Ray Crystallography with Small Angle X-Ray Scattering to Model Unstructured Regions of Nsa1 from S. Cerevisiae

Published on: January 10, 2018

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Assembly and Characterization of Polyelectrolyte Complex Micelles
08:44

Assembly and Characterization of Polyelectrolyte Complex Micelles

Published on: March 2, 2020

10.7K
Contrast-Matching Detergent in Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Experiments for Membrane Protein Structural Analysis and Ab Initio Modeling
10:27

Contrast-Matching Detergent in Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Experiments for Membrane Protein Structural Analysis and Ab Initio Modeling

Published on: October 21, 2018

12.4K
Combining X-Ray Crystallography with Small Angle X-Ray Scattering to Model Unstructured Regions of Nsa1 from S. Cerevisiae
09:15

Combining X-Ray Crystallography with Small Angle X-Ray Scattering to Model Unstructured Regions of Nsa1 from S. Cerevisiae

Published on: January 10, 2018

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Nanotechnology
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) is a key technique for characterizing nanoparticle size and shape in solution.
  • Selecting appropriate models for SAXS data analysis is critical but challenging, especially for non-experts.
  • Existing methods require significant user expertise and can be time-consuming.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an automated algorithm for selecting the optimal nanoparticle model from SAXS data.
  • To address the difficulties and time constraints associated with manual model selection.
  • To improve the accessibility and efficiency of nanoparticle characterization using SAXS.

Main Methods:

  • Machine learning and representation learning techniques were employed.
  • SAXS-specific preprocessing methods were integrated into the algorithm.
  • A large simulated database of 75,000 scattering spectra from nine nanoparticle models was created, simulating two device configurations.
  • The algorithm was trained and evaluated on simulated data and validated on a real experimental dataset.

Main Results:

  • The proposed algorithm instantly selects the best-suited nanoparticle model for SAXS data.
  • Training the algorithm on multiple device configurations demonstrated good generalization capabilities without performance degradation.
  • The study highlighted challenges in transferring classification rules between different SAXS instrument configurations.
  • Validation on real SAXS data provided initial insights into the transferability of findings from simulated data.

Conclusions:

  • An automated machine learning approach can effectively select nanoparticle models for SAXS data analysis.
  • Generalizing the algorithm across multiple instrument configurations is feasible and crucial for wider applicability.
  • The developed algorithm and simulated database offer a valuable resource for the SAXS community.