Cardiac interventions on total knee arthroplasty: a national inpatient sample-based analysis

Comorbid cardiovascular diseases have been associated with poor outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, our understanding of TKA with prior cardiac treatment procedures has largely been undocumented. In this study, we examined TKA patients who had undergone different cardiac interventions that addressed their condition. The purpose was to characterize and compare outcomes for a growing patient population not yet analyzed.

The 2016-2019 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried for 558,256 patients who had TKA (ICD-10CM). Backgrounds significant for pacemaker [PM] (n = 8025), coronary artery bypass [CABG] (n = 12,683), heart valve surgery [HV] (n = 4125), or coronary stent [CS] (n = 19,483) were compared against those without, across demographics, admission information, and various complications.

Cardiac interventions were associated with increased age, male gender, length of stay, and cost of care. CABG, and Stent groups had more diabetics, but HV had significantly fewer (p = 0.008). PM and HV had significantly less tobacco use and, in addition to CABG, less obesity. Postoperatively, mortality was elevated in the PM [Odds ratio (OR) 2.89, p = 0.008], CABG (OR 2.53, p = 0.006) and CS group (OR 1.94, p = 0.018), but not HV. Myocardial infarctions were elevated in the CABG (OR 3.874) and CS group (OR 5.11) (p < 0.001). PM, HV, and CS had increased odds of periprosthetic fracture by 2.15-fold (p < 0.001), 2.09-fold (p < 0.001), 1.29-fold (p = 0.011) respectively. HV saw increased periprosthetic mechanical complications (OR 1.48, p = 0.006). CABG increased the odds of deep surgical site infection 14.23-fold and CS 9.22-fold (p < 0.001). Postoperative pneumonia was increased in PM, CABG, and CS groups (OR 2.15,), (OR 2.21,), (OR 1.64,) (p < 0.001).

Patients who have undergone cardiac intervention are generally at risk for adverse stays. Furthermore, risk factors and complications vary between the groups. Our analysis emphasizes the importance of individualized medical care and as a basis for electing and informing patients for TKA.