Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
Published on: April 12, 2019
Partial Molar Solvation Volume of the Hydrated Electron Simulated Via DFT
William R Borrelli1, Kenneth J Mei1, Sanghyun J Park1
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1569, United States.
Abstract:
Different simulation models of the hydrated electron produce different solvation structures, but it has been challenging to determine which simulated solvation structure, if any, is the most comparable to experiment. In a recent work, Neupane et al. [J. Phys. Chem. B 2023, 127, 5941-5947] showed using Kirkwood-Buff theory that the partial molar volume of the hydrated electron, which is known experimentally, can be readily computed from an integral over the simulated electron-water radial distribution function. This provides a sensitive way to directly compare the hydration structure of different simulation models of the hydrated electron with experiment. Here, we compute the partial molar volume of an ab-initio-simulated hydrated electron model based on density-functional theory (DFT) with a hybrid functional at different simulated system sizes. We find that the partial molar volume of the DFT-simulated hydrated electron is not converged with respect to the system size for simulations with up to 128 waters. We show that even at the largest simulation sizes, the partial molar volume of DFT-simulated hydrated electrons is underestimated by a factor of 2 with respect to experiment, and at the standard 64-water size commonly used in the literature, DFT-based simulations underestimate the experimental solvation volume by a factor of ∼3.5. An extrapolation to larger box sizes does predict the experimental partial molar volume correctly; however, larger system sizes than those explored here are currently intractable without the use of machine-learned potentials. These results bring into question what aspects of the predicted hydrated electron radial distribution function, as calculated by DFT-based simulations with the PBEh-D3 functional, deviate from the true solvation structure.
More Related Videos
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
06:37Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
Published on: September 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Solubility Equilibria: Ionic Product of Water
The ionic product of water varies with temperature, and its value is 1.0 x 10−14 at standard experimental conditions. Per Le...
Real Gases: Effects of Intermolecular Forces and Molecular Volume Deriving Van der Waals Equation
Electrolytes: van't Hoff Factor
The colligative properties of a solution depend only on the number, not on the identity, of solute species dissolved. The concentration terms in the equations for various colligative properties (freezing point depression, boiling point elevation, osmotic pressure) pertain to all solute species present in the solution. Nonelectrolytes dissolve physically without dissociation or any other accompanying process. Each molecule that dissolves yields one...
Aqueous Solutions and Heats of Hydration
When ionic compounds dissolve in water, the ions in the solid separate and disperse uniformly throughout the solution because water molecules surround and solvate the ions, reducing the strong electrostatic forces between them. This process...
Molecular Geometry and Dipole Moments
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...