Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
Histopathologic evaluation of gastric intestinal metaplasia in non-neoplastic biopsy specimens: Accuracy and
Thiyaphat Laohawetwanit1, Natcha Wanpiyarat2, Nathawadee Lerttanatum2
1Division of Pathology, Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand; Division of Pathology, Thammasat University Hospital, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and interobserver reliability of diagnosing and subtyping gastric intestinal metaplasia (IM) among general pathologists and pathology residents at a university hospital in Thailand, focusing on the challenges in the histopathologic evaluation of gastric IM for less experienced practitioners.
Methods:
The study analyzed 44 non-neoplastic gastric biopsies, using a consensus diagnosis of gastrointestinal pathologists as the reference standard. Participants included 6 general pathologists and 9 pathology residents who assessed gastric IM and categorized its subtype (complete, incomplete, or mixed) on digital slides. After initial evaluations and receiving feedback, participants reviewed specific images of gastric IM, as agreed by experts. Following a one-month washout period, a reevaluation of the slides was conducted.
Results:
Diagnostic accuracy, interobserver reliability, and time taken for diagnosis improved following training, with general pathologists showing higher accuracies than residents (median accuracy of gastric IM detection: 100 % vs. 97.7 %). Increased years of experience were associated with more IM detection accuracy (p-value<0.05). However, the overall median accuracy for diagnosing incomplete IM remained lower than for complete IM (86.4 % vs. 97.7 %). After training, diagnostic errors occurred in 6 out of 44 specimens (13.6 %), reported by over 40 % of participants. Errors involved omitting 5 slides with incomplete IM and 1 with complete IM, all showing a subtle presence of IM.
Conclusions:
The study highlights the diagnostic challenges in identifying incomplete gastric IM, showing notable discrepancies in accuracy and interobserver agreement. It underscores the need for better diagnostic protocols and training to enhance detection and management outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Gastritis-I: Introduction and Types
Acute gastritis presents as a sudden inflammation triggered by various stressors to the stomach lining, such as exposure to corrosive agents, local irritants like aspirin and other NSAIDs, alcohol consumption, radiation therapy, physical trauma, severe burns, sepsis,...
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.