Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Soil Lysimeter Excavation for Coupled Hydrological, Geochemical, and Microbiological Investigations
Published on: September 11, 2016
Prediction of sulfate concentrations in groundwater in areas with complex hydrogeological conditions based on machine
Yushan Tian1, Quanli Liu1, Yao Ji1
1State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
Abstract:
The persistent and increasing levels of sulfate due to a variety of human activities over the last decades present a widely concerning environmental issue. Understanding the controlling factors of groundwater sulfate and predicting sulfate concentration is critical for governments or managers to provide information on groundwater protection. In this study, the integration of self-organizing map (SOM) approach and machine learning (ML) modeling offers the potential to determine the factors and predict sulfate concentrations in the Huaibei Plain, where groundwater is enriched with sulfate and the areas have complex hydrogeological conditions. The SOM calculation was used to illustrate groundwater hydrochemistry and analyze the correlations among the hydrochemical parameters. Three ML algorithms including random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and back propagation neural network (BPNN) were adopted to predict sulfate levels in groundwater by using 501 groundwater samples and 8 predictor variables. The prediction performance was evaluated through statistical metrics (R2, MSE and MAE). Mine drainage mainly facilitated increase in groundwater SO42- while gypsum dissolution and pyrite oxidation were found another two potential sources. The major water chemistry type was Ca-HCO3. The dominant cation was Na+ while the dominant anion was HCO3-. There was an intuitive correlation between groundwater sulfate and total dissolved solids (TDS), Cl-, and Na+. By using input variables identified by the SOM method, the evaluation results of ML algorithms showed that the R2, MSE and MAE of RF, SVM, BPNN were 0.43-0.70, 0.16-0.49 and 0.25-0.44. Overall, BPNN showed the best prediction performance and had higher R2 values and lower error indices. TDS and Na+ had a high contribution to the prediction accuracy. These findings are crucial for developing groundwater protection and remediation policies, enabling more sustainable management.
More Related Videos
09:44Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
Published on: October 16, 2018
08:27Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
Published on: January 5, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
Complexometric Titration: Ligands
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Factors Affecting Solubility