Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

109
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
109
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility01:34

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

3.1K
Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
3.1K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

12.0K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alabama's <i>LePage</i> decision, the future of <i>ex vivo</i> embryos, and more.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2026
Same author

Drug Labels as Evidence of Patent Infringement - A Troubling Legal Trend.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

David's Sling: Bioethics Empiricism as Big Tech Goliaths Enter Genomics.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

The need for a global effort to attend to human neural organoid and assembloid research.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

A Sociotechnical Approach to Genomic Data Privacy: A Comparative Analysis.

International data privacy law·2025
Same author

A "Bare Hope of A Result": The Second CRISPR Patent Appeal.

The CRISPR journal·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.6K

The Myriad Decision at 10.

Jacob S Sherkow1,2,3, Robert Cook-Deegan4, Henry T Greely5

  • 1College of Law and European Union Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA;

Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
|February 29, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Ten years after the Supreme Court ruling in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., the decision

Keywords:
MyriadSupreme Courtgeneticslawpatents

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.0K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.6K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.0K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Genetics

Background:

  • The Supreme Court's 2013 decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. declared isolated genes unpatentable.
  • This ruling was anticipated to significantly impact the biotechnology industry's patenting practices and future health.
  • The case garnered substantial political and cultural attention beyond its immediate legal implications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the long-term impact of the Myriad Genetics decision on patent law and the biotechnology sector.
  • To assess the extent to which the ruling has influenced patenting practices domestically and internationally.
  • To analyze the success of legislative efforts to overturn the Supreme Court's conclusion.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of patent law developments post-2013.
  • Review of patenting trends in the biotechnology industry.
  • Examination of legislative proposals and their outcomes.
  • Comparative assessment of the Myriad decision's influence versus broader legal and scientific advancements.

Main Results:

  • The Myriad decision's direct impact on patentable subject matter law was less transformative than initially perceived.
  • The ruling had a modest effect on patenting practices within and outside the United States.
  • Legislative attempts to reverse the decision have been unsuccessful.
  • Broader scientific and legal developments have overshadowed the Myriad case's significance.

Conclusions:

  • Despite its notoriety, the Myriad Genetics ruling's influence on patent law has been limited.
  • The biotechnology industry's patent landscape has evolved due to factors beyond this specific court decision.
  • The true legacy of the Myriad case is obscured by more significant shifts in science and law over the past decade.