Comparison of Pressure Control Ventilation and Palpation Methods to Protect the Endotracheal Tube Cuff During...

Objective This study aims to evaluate and compare the suitability and safety of palpation and pressure control ventilation (PCV) methods for the accurate positioning of an endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff. Methods We conducted a pilot simulation randomized crossover study using a medical manikin. Twenty junior resident physicians who had completed anesthesiology training participated in the study. Airway management was performed using a modified manikin designed to simulate palpation and PCV methods. Participants performed both methods in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the number of successful ETT placements. The secondary outcomes were procedure duration and the perceived difficulty of each procedure. Results Five successful procedures were observed in the palpation method group (PALG), while 19 were observed in the PCV method group (PCVG). The duration of the trial was 98 s (standard deviation [SD], 41) in the PALG and 93 s (SD, 49) in the PCVG. The visual analog scale score for difficulty encountered during the trial was 30 (SD, 21) in the PALG and 69 (SD, 19) in the PCVG. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the PCV method had a higher success rate than the palpation method. Thus, the PCV method may be more suitable for inexperienced physicians to perform the procedure with greater confidence.