Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Case study on communicating with research ethics committees about minimizing risk through software: an application
Cason Schmit1,2, Alva O Ferdinand2, Theodoros Giannouchos1,3
1Population Informatics Lab, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) experts co-created language for describing privacy-enhancing software in secondary data research. This aims to improve communication and risk assessment for retrospective studies using complex software.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Bioethics
- Data Privacy
Background:
- Researchers often use complex software for retrospective secondary data analysis, seeking waivers of consent from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).
- Little is known about IRB experts' perspectives on risk mitigation strategies involving such software.
- Effective communication between researchers and IRBs is crucial for navigating these complex studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To co-create appropriate language for describing privacy-enhancing software to IRBs.
- To understand IRB experts' views on risks, benefits, and informational needs related to secondary data research software.
- To develop template materials for IRB applications involving privacy-enhancing software.
Main Methods:
- Two structured focus groups with IRB experts to identify key considerations.
- Development of a template IRB application and responses for studies using privacy-enhancing software.
- A three-round Delphi study with 17 experts to refine the template materials based on feedback.
Main Results:
- Focus groups generated 13 ideas on risks, benefits, and informational needs.
- Most experts agreed privacy-enhancing software minimizes risk, but inherent disclosure risks remain in secondary data studies.
- A majority (84.6%) found retrospective data-only studies with no subject contact to be minimal risk.
Conclusions:
- Disagreements exist among IRB experts regarding risk in secondary data research, potentially affecting review outcomes.
- The highest-ranked risks and benefits of privacy-enhancing software were societal (e.g., facilitating research, risk of invalid results).
- Effective communication and collaboration, incorporating privacy experts early in the design process (privacy-by-design), are essential for developing privacy-enhancing technologies.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Archival Research
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...

