Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Marcia's Theory of Identity Status01:26

Marcia's Theory of Identity Status

124
James Marcia's identity status model provides a framework for understanding how adolescents navigate identity formation through varying degrees of exploration and commitment. Marcia's model builds on Erik Erikson's theories of psychosocial development, focusing specifically on how adolescents reconcile individual aspirations with societal expectations. His model describes identity formation as a dynamic process where adolescents move between different states depending on their level...
124
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Bystander Effect02:09

Bystander Effect

9.6K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.6K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nominalist dispositional essentialism.

Synthese·2022
Same journal

A plea for multilateralism.

Philosophical studies·2026
Same journal

The Pragmatics and the Normativity of Ignorance Attributions.

Philosophical studies·2026
Same journal

The form of <i>good</i>.

Philosophical studies·2026
Same journal

Being social, being socially constructed, and being fundamental relative to social reality.

Philosophical studies·2026
Same journal

Epistemic innocence and the production of false memory beliefs.

Philosophical studies·2026
Same journal

Moral encroachment and group-to-individual inferences.

Philosophical studies·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.0K

Ground by Status.

Lisa Vogt1,2

  • 1Department of Philosophy, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Philosophical Studies
|March 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores the grounding role of status-truths, like essence-truths, defending the "Ground by Status" principle against logical objections to its explanatory power.

Keywords:
EssenceExplanationGroundingLogic of groundingNecessity

More Related Videos

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.9K
Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.0K
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.9K
Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.2K

Area of Science:

  • Metaphysics
  • Philosophy of Logic

Background:

  • Investigates the explanatory role of 'status-truths' (essence-truths, necessity-truths, law-truths).
  • Introduces the 'Ground by Status' principle: status truths ground their prejacents.
  • Highlights a significant objection: inconsistency with established grounding logic principles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the explanatory function of various status-truths.
  • To defend the 'Ground by Status' principle against contemporary objections.
  • To reconcile 'Ground by Status' with accepted principles of grounding logic.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of grounding principles.
  • Argumentation against objections to the 'Ground by Status' principle.
  • Examination of logical consistency between status-truths and grounding.

Main Results:

  • The 'Ground by Status' principle, though facing objections, is defended.
  • Arguments are presented to show compatibility between 'Ground by Status' and grounding logic.
  • The explanatory power of status-truths in grounding is reasserted.

Conclusions:

  • The 'Ground by Status' principle offers a viable account of the explanatory role of status-truths.
  • The identified objections to 'Ground by Status' can be overcome.
  • This defense strengthens the understanding of metaphysical grounding and its relation to truth.