Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement in Obese Patients: A Propensity-Matched Study
Federico Cammertoni1,2, Piergiorgio Bruno1,2, Natalia Pavone1
1Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Cardiac Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Insights
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) is safe and effective for obese patients, offering faster recovery and shorter intensive care unit stays compared to conventional methods. This approach improves respiratory outcomes and should be considered for this patient group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Obesity increases risks for cardiac surgery complications.
- Evaluating alternative surgical approaches is crucial for patient safety and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) via upper sternotomy in obese patients.
- To compare MIAVR with conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR) in this specific population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 203 obese patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement (January 2014-January 2023).
- Comparison between 106 MIAVR patients and 97 CAVR patients.
- Propensity-matched analysis created two balanced groups of 91 patients each to control for baseline differences.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in 30-day mortality between MIAVR and CAVR groups (1.1% vs. 0%, P=0.99).
- MIAVR demonstrated significantly faster extubation (6 ± 2 vs. 9 ± 2 hours, P<0.01) and reduced need for continuous positive airway pressure therapy (3.3% vs. 13.2%, P=0.03).
- Intensive care unit stay was shorter for MIAVR patients (1.8 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 1.4 days, P<0.01), with comparable long-term survival (logrank P=0.58).
Conclusions:
- Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via upper sternotomy is a safe and effective option for obese patients.
- The approach offers significant benefits in respiratory outcomes, including reduced mechanical ventilation time and post-extubation support.
- Shorter intensive care unit stays suggest MIAVR is advantageous for obese individuals, and this approach should not be withheld.
Introduction:
Obese patients are at risk of complications after cardiac surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate safety and efficacy of a minimally invasive approach via upper sternotomy in this setting.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 203 obese patients who underwent isolated, elective aortic valve replacement between January 2014 and January 2023 - 106 with minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) and 97 with conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR). To account for baseline differences, a propensity-matching analysis was performed obtaining two balanced groups of 91 patients each.
Results:
The 30-day mortality rate was comparable between groups (1.1% MIAVR vs. 0% CAVR, P=0.99). MIAVR patients had faster extubation than CAVR patients (6 ± 2 vs. 9 ± 2 hours, P<0.01). Continuous positive airway pressure therapy was less common in the MIAVR than in the CAVR group (3.3% vs. 13.2%, P=0.03). Other postoperative complications did not differ significantly. Intensive care unit stay (1.8 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 1.4 days, P<0.01), but not hospital stay (6.7 ± 2.1 vs. 7.2 ± 1.9 days, P=0.09), was shorter for MIAVR than for CAVR patients. Follow-up survival was comparable (logrank P-value = 0.58).
Conclusion:
MIAVR via upper sternotomy has been shown to be a safe and effective option for obese patients. Respiratory outcome was promising with shorter mechanical ventilation time and reduced need for post-extubation support. The length of stay in the intensive care unit was reduced. These advantages might be important for the obese patient to whom minimally invasive surgery should not be denied.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

