Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

167
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
167
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

126
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
126
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

137
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
137
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

78
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
78
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

100
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
100
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

126
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
126

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CBCRisk-Mastectomy: A Prediction Tool to Aid Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision- making.

The Journal of surgical research·2026
Same author

Competing-triggering effect models for multitype recurrent event data.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Markers of immune function and survival among cancer patients with HIV in the United States: a population-based registry linkage study.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2026
Same author

CBCRisk-Mastectomy: A Risk Prediction Tool to Aid Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision Making.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Unveiling clinical decision-making in pediatric surgery: how frontline staff perform and what shapes their skills.

BMC medical education·2026
Same author

Incorporating Auxiliary Information into Assessment of Accuracy and Discrimination of Risk Models When Some Predictors are Missing.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

Predicting absolute risk for a person with missing risk factors.

Bang Wang1, Yu Cheng1,2, Mitchell H Gail3

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|March 1, 2024
PubMed
Summary

When projecting absolute risk with missing data, using a reference dataset with a similar predictor distribution to the target population is crucial. This minimizes bias in risk predictions, even when data is missing at random.

Keywords:
Absolute riskbreast cancermissing predictors for absolute risk modelsmultiple imputationreference datarisk scoretarget population.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.2K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.2K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Accurate absolute risk projection is vital for clinical decision-making.
  • Missing predictor data in target populations complicates absolute risk estimation.
  • Existing methods may introduce bias when predictor distributions differ between reference and target datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of seven methods for projecting absolute risk when predictors are missing.
  • To evaluate bias and mean squared error of different imputation strategies.
  • To identify optimal methods for absolute risk prediction in the presence of missing data.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations using real breast cancer predictor distributions and outcome data.
  • Comparison of methods imputing individual predictors versus risk scores.
  • Analysis of a real-world breast cancer dataset.

Main Results:

  • The greatest bias stemmed from differing predictor distributions between reference and target populations.
  • No single method achieved unbiased predictions when distributions varied.
  • Multiple imputation methods showed comparable performance, with less bias but higher variability than single risk score methods.
  • Violation of the missing at random (MAR) assumption did not lead to severe bias.

Conclusions:

  • Selecting a reference dataset that closely matches the target population's predictor distribution is essential for reducing bias in absolute risk predictions.
  • Careful consideration of reference data is paramount when dealing with missing risk factors.
  • Multiple imputation techniques offer a robust approach for absolute risk projection with missing data.