Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Comparative effectiveness and safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in treatment of left ventricular thrombus- a meta-analysis
Tong Hu1, Changli Chen1, Kellina Maduray1
1National Key Laboratory for Innovation and Transformation of Luobing Theory; The Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education, Chinese National Health Commission and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 107 Wen Hua Xi Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Insights
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) show comparable efficacy to Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for left ventricular thrombus (LVT) resolution. DOACs demonstrate superior safety, significantly reducing stroke, mortality, and bleeding events in LVT patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a common complication in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiomyopathies.
- Optimal oral anticoagulation for LVT resolution remains debated, with Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as the guideline-recommended choice.
- Growing evidence supports the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for LVT management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs in patients with LVT.
- To evaluate outcomes including thrombus resolution, ischemic events, mortality, and bleeding complications.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was performed across major databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus) in July 2023.
- Efficacy outcomes included thrombus resolution, stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and adverse cardiovascular events.
- Safety outcomes comprised any bleeding, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage. Twenty-seven studies were included in the meta-analysis.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in LVT resolution was observed between DOACs and VKAs (RR=1.00, P=0.99).
- Overall, DOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke (RR=0.74, P=0.021), all-cause mortality (RR=0.70, P=0.001), any bleeding (RR=0.75, P=0.006), and major bleeding (RR=0.67, P=0.001) compared to VKAs.
- Subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed no significant differences for these outcomes. Rivaroxaban specifically showed a reduced risk of stroke compared to VKAs (RR=0.24, P=0.011).
Conclusions:
- DOACs offer non-inferior efficacy and superior safety compared to VKAs for LVT treatment.
- DOACs represent a promising alternative therapeutic option for managing left ventricular thrombus.
- Further robust research is recommended to validate these findings.
Background And Objective:
Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) formation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or cardiomyopathies is not uncommon. The optimal oral anticoagulation therapy for resolving LVT has been under intense debate. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain the anticoagulant of choice for this condition, according to practice guidelines. Evidence supporting the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the management of LVT continues to grow. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases in July 2023. The efficacy outcomes of this study were thrombus resolution, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, stroke/systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and adverse cardiovascular events. The safety outcomes were any bleeding, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of twenty-seven eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. Data were analyzed utilizing Stata software version 15.1.
Results:
There was no significant difference between DOACs and VKAs with regard to LVT resolution (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.95-1.05, P = 0.99). In the overall analysis, DOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.96, P = 0.021), all-cause mortality (RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.86, P = 0.001), any bleeding (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92, P = 0.006) and major bleeding (RR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.85, P = 0.001) when compared to VKAs. Meanwhile, in the sub-analysis examining randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the aforementioned outcomes no longer differed significantly between the DOACs and VKAs groups. The incidences of systemic embolism (RR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.54-1.22, P = 0.32), stroke/systemic embolism (RR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.72-1.00, P = 0.056), intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.23-1.54, P = 0.28), and adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.63-1.56, P = 0.92) were comparable between the DOACs and VKAs groups. A subgroup analysis showed that patients treated with rivaroxaban had a significantly lower risk of stroke (RR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.72, P = 0.011) than those in the VKAs group.
Conclusion:
With non-inferior efficacy and superior safety, DOACs are promising therapeutic alternatives to VKAs in the treatment of LVT. Further robust investigations are warranted to confirm our findings.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Therapeutic Index

