Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

1.4K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
1.4K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.7K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
1.7K
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

573
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
573
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

3.3K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.3K
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.3K
A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
1.3K
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System01:29

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System

5.6K
The issues and trends in healthcare delivery are constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic is one recent issue that wreaked havoc on healthcare systems, causing a shortage of healthcare workers, high demand for medicines and supplies, and increased medical expenditure due to a lack of insurance. Other issues include rising healthcare costs and care fragmentation.
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
5.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Joint probability framework for the development and validation of a prognostic model for the conditional outcome of quality of life: a retrospective study in historical European cohorts of survivors of head and neck cancer.

The Lancet. Digital health·2026
Same author

A Bayesian network approach for understanding causal dependencies in chronic patients' medication non-adherence.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Impact of Dimensionality on Medication Adherence Prediction: Assessing Accuracy and Computational Efficiency<sup></sup>.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

The BRAINTEASER Datasets: Clinical, Wearable and Environmental Data for ALS & MS Progression Modeling.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Structure function in photoplethysmographic signal dynamics for physiological assessment.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Improving Participant Recruitment in Clinical Trials: Comparative Analysis of Innovative Digital Platforms.

Journal of medical Internet research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

2.3K

Enhancing worker-centred digitalisation in industrial environments: A KPI evaluation methodology.

Patricia Abril-Jiménez1, Diego Carvajal-Flores1, Eduardo Buhid1

  • 1Life Supporting Technologies Research Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avda Complutense 30, 28040, Madrid, Spain.

Heliyon
|March 4, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Industry 5.0 emphasizes human-centric industrial transformation, unlike Industry 4.0. This study introduces a new evaluation methodology incorporating human actors to assess digitalization benefits for workers and stakeholders.

Keywords:
Cyber-physical systemsData driven decision makingDigital transformationKey performance indicatorsSmart industry

More Related Videos

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

15.2K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
06:02

Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios

Published on: October 6, 2020

2.3K
Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

15.2K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Industrial Engineering
  • Digital Transformation
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Industry 4.0 focused on technology-driven digitalization.
  • Existing KPI methods for smart industry assessment lack systematic inclusion of human actors.
  • Industry 5.0 initiative highlights the importance of human-centric value creation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the gap in current evaluation methods by proposing a novel methodology.
  • To systematically incorporate multiple human actors into the digitalization process assessment.
  • To evaluate the direct and indirect benefits of technology-driven transformation for human workers and stakeholders.

Main Methods:

  • Development of an evaluation methodology integrating human actors.
  • Proposal of assessment tools and instruments for technological and human factors.
  • Application of four core indicators to a real-world case study comparing three companies.

Main Results:

  • The methodology provides a framework for assessing digitalization impacts.
  • It enables evaluation of benefits related to technology integration, process optimization, and human factors.
  • Case study demonstrated the practical application and comparison of digitalization processes.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed methodology effectively incorporates human actors in digitalization assessment.
  • It facilitates the evaluation of technology-driven transformation aligned with Industry 5.0 principles.
  • This approach supports achieving goals for both human workers and business stakeholders.