Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Sexual Transmission of American Trypanosomes from Males and Females to Naive Mates
Published on: January 27, 2019
Comparative evaluation of lateral flow assays to diagnose chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Bolivia
Ronald López1, Andrea García1, José Jorge Chura Aruni1
1Instituto Nacional de Laboratorios de Salud (INLASA), La Paz, Bolivia.
Insights
Simplified Chagas disease testing in Bolivia is crucial. Lateral flow assays (LFAs) show high accuracy, comparable to lab tests, potentially improving diagnosis rates for this neglected tropical disease.
Area of Science:
- Tropical Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Assay Development
Background:
- Bolivia faces the world's highest incidence of Chagas disease (CD), a chronic condition caused by Trypanosoma cruzi.
- Current diagnostic methods are complex, costly, and inaccessible, leading to low diagnosis rates (estimated 6% in Bolivia).
- Simplifying diagnostic pathways is essential for Chagas disease control and elimination efforts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of 10 commercially available lateral flow assays (LFAs) for Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Bolivia.
- To generate unbiased data on LFA sensitivity and specificity.
- To assess the utility of LFAs in improving Chagas disease diagnosis rates efficiently.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, laboratory-based diagnostic evaluation study.
- Tested 470 serum samples (221 CD-positive, 249 CD-negative) using 10 LFAs and Bolivia's current diagnostic algorithm as the reference.
- LFAs were blinded and performed by three operators; performance was scored using a decision-tree algorithm.
Main Results:
- LFA sensitivities ranged from 62.2% to 97.7%, with 5/10 tests exceeding 90% sensitivity.
- Specificities ranged from 78.6% to 100%, with 6/10 tests exceeding 95% specificity.
- Four LFAs demonstrated high sensitivity (93-95%) and specificity (97-99%); agreement with reference tests was almost perfect (Kappa 0.83-0.94).
Conclusions:
- Several evaluated LFAs exhibit performance comparable to existing laboratory-based diagnostic methods for Chagas disease.
- LFAs offer a promising, simplified approach to improve diagnosis rates in resource-limited settings like Bolivia.
- Widespread adoption of accurate LFAs could significantly enhance Chagas disease management and control strategies.
Abstract:
Bolivia has the highest incidence of Chagas disease (CD) worldwide. Caused by the parasite Trypanasoma cruzi, CD is generally a chronic condition. Diagnosis is logistically and financially challenging, requiring at least two different laboratory-based serological tests. Many CD cases are missed; in Bolivia it is estimated just 6% of individuals chronically infected with T. cruzi get diagnosed. Achieving control on the way to elimination of CD requires a radical simplification of the current CD testing pathways, to overcome the barriers to accessing CD treatment. We aimed to generate unbiased performance data of lateral flow assays (LFAs) for T. cruzi infection in Bolivia, to evaluate their usefulness for improving T. cruzi diagnosis rates in a precise and efficient manner. This retrospective, laboratory-based, diagnostic evaluation study sought to estimate the sensitivity/specificity of 10 commercially available LFAs for T. cruzi, using the current CD diagnostic algorithm employed in Bolivia as the reference test method. All tests were blinded at the study site and performed by three operators. In total, 470 serum samples were tested, including 221 and 249 characterized as CD-positive/-negative, respectively. The LFAs were scored according to their relative importance using a decision-tree-based algorithm, with the mean decrease in Gini index as the scoring metric. The estimates of sensitivities ranged from 62.2-97.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) lower bound 55.0-94.7%); for specificities the range was 78.6-100% (95% CI lower bound 72.0-97.5%); 5/10 and 6/10 tests had sensitivity >90% and specificity >95%, respectively. Four LFAs showed high values of both sensitivity (93-95%) and specificity (97-99%). The agreement between 6 LFAs and the reference tests was almost perfect (Kappa 0.83-0.94). Most LFAs evaluated thus showed performances comparable with current laboratory-based diagnostic methods.

