Comparison of visual performance between diffractive bifocal and diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses
Junya Kawamura1, Hirotaka Tanabe2, Tomohiro Shojo1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji, Japan.
Scientific Reports
|March 4, 2024
Summary
This study compared diffractive bifocal and trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) after cataract surgery. The bifocal IOL offered superior near vision and reduced higher-order aberrations, while the trifocal IOL provided better intermediate vision and contrast sensitivity, with and without glare.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Optics
Background:
- Cataract surgery often involves intraocular lens (IOL) implantation to restore vision.
- Advanced IOLs, including diffractive bifocal and trifocal designs, aim to provide a wider range of visual clarity.
- Evaluating the comparative visual performance of these IOLs is crucial for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the visual performance of a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with +4.0 D near addition (ZMB00) against a diffractive trifocal IOL (AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00) with +2.17 D and +3.25 D near addition.
- To assess key postoperative visual parameters 10 weeks after bilateral IOL implantation.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 1448 eyes from 724 patients who underwent bilateral implantation of either ZMB00 or TFNT00 IOLs.
- Data collected included uncorrected visual acuities, contrast sensitivity (with and without glare), and higher-order aberrations.
- Statistical analysis utilized a linear mixed-effects model, adjusting for multiple confounding factors like age, sex, and ocular characteristics.
Main Results:
- The diffractive bifocal (ZMB00) group demonstrated significantly better uncorrected near visual acuity and lower ocular/internal higher-order aberrations.
- The diffractive trifocal (TFNT00) group showed significantly better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity and superior contrast sensitivity, both with and without glare.
- These findings were statistically significant (p < 0.00068) after rigorous adjustments.
Conclusions:
- Both diffractive bifocal and trifocal IOLs offer distinct visual advantages.
- The choice between bifocal and trifocal IOLs may depend on individual patient needs and visual priorities, particularly concerning near versus intermediate vision.
- Further research could explore long-term outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction with each IOL type.
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
2.8K
Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...
2.8K
Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy
8.0K
Phase-Contrast Microscopes
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
8.0K


