A risk analysis of alpelisib-induced hyperglycemia in patients with advanced solid tumors and breast cancer
Jordi Rodón1, David Demanse2, Hope S Rugo3
1Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. jrodon@mdanderson.org.
Background:
Hyperglycemia is an on-target effect of PI3Kα inhibitors. Early identification and intervention of treatment-induced hyperglycemia is important for improving management of patients receiving a PI3Kα inhibitor like alpelisib. Here, we characterize incidence of grade 3/4 alpelisib-related hyperglycemia, along with time to event, management, and outcomes using a machine learning model.
Methods:
Data for the risk model were pooled from patients receiving alpelisib ± fulvestrant in the open-label, phase 1 X2101 trial and the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 SOLAR-1 trial. The pooled population (n = 505) included patients with advanced solid tumors (X2101, n = 221) or HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (SOLAR-1, n = 284). External validation was performed using BYLieve trial patient data (n = 340). Hyperglycemia incidence and management were analyzed for SOLAR-1.
Results:
A random forest model identified 5 baseline characteristics most associated with risk of developing grade 3/4 hyperglycemia (fasting plasma glucose, body mass index, HbA1c, monocytes, age). This model was used to derive a score to classify patients as high or low risk for developing grade 3/4 hyperglycemia. Applying the model to patients treated with alpelisib and fulvestrant in SOLAR-1 showed higher incidence of hyperglycemia (all grade and grade 3/4), increased use of antihyperglycemic medications, and more discontinuations due to hyperglycemia (16.7% vs. 2.6% of discontinuations) in the high- versus low-risk group. Among patients in SOLAR-1 (alpelisib + fulvestrant arm) with PIK3CA mutations, median progression-free survival was similar between the high- and low-risk groups (11.0 vs. 10.9 months). For external validation, the model was applied to the BYLieve trial, for which successful classification into high- and low-risk groups with shorter time to grade 3/4 hyperglycemia in the high-risk group was observed.
Conclusions:
A risk model using 5 clinically relevant baseline characteristics was able to identify patients at higher or lower probability for developing alpelisib-induced hyperglycemia. Early identification of patients who may be at higher risk for hyperglycemia may improve management (including monitoring and early intervention) and potentially lead to improved outcomes.
Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01219699 (registration date: October 13, 2010; retrospectively registered), ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02437318 (registration date: May 7, 2015); ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03056755 (registration date: February 17, 2017).
Insights
A new machine learning model identifies patients at high risk for hyperglycemia caused by alpelisib, a PI3Kα inhibitor. Early risk identification can improve patient management and outcomes during treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Hyperglycemia is a known side effect of PI3Kα inhibitors like alpelisib.
- Early detection and management of treatment-induced hyperglycemia are crucial for patients on PI3Kα inhibitors.
- This study aimed to characterize hyperglycemia incidence and outcomes associated with alpelisib using a machine learning approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a machine learning model for predicting the risk of grade 3/4 hyperglycemia in patients treated with alpelisib.
- To identify baseline characteristics associated with hyperglycemia risk.
- To evaluate the impact of risk stratification on hyperglycemia management and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A random forest model was developed using pooled data from the X2101 and SOLAR-1 trials (n=505).
- The model identified 5 key baseline predictors: fasting plasma glucose, BMI, HbA1c, monocytes, and age.
- External validation was performed using data from the BYLieve trial (n=340).
Main Results:
- The model successfully classified patients into high- and low-risk groups for hyperglycemia.
- In the SOLAR-1 trial, high-risk patients had higher incidence of hyperglycemia, increased antihyperglycemic medication use, and more treatment discontinuations.
- Progression-free survival was similar between risk groups in PIK3CA-mutated patients; external validation confirmed the model's predictive capability.
Conclusions:
- A 5-factor risk model effectively identifies patients likely to develop alpelisib-induced hyperglycemia.
- Early identification of high-risk individuals allows for proactive management strategies, including monitoring and intervention.
- Improved management of hyperglycemia in at-risk patients may lead to better treatment outcomes.
More Related Videos
11:13Author Spotlight: Exploring Salidroside's Molecular Mechanisms in Breast Cancer Treatment
Published on: June 9, 2023
07:22Glycemic Impact on Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms on Physical, Radiographic, and Inflammatory Markers among Individuals Aged 50 and Over with Diabetes
Published on: March 7, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
