Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: May 10, 2022
Clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and process evaluation of group schema therapy for eating disorders: study
Suzanne H W Mares1, Jeffrey Roelofs2, Janôt Zinzen2,3
1Department of Eating Disorders (Amarum), GGNet Mental Health, St. Annastraat 312c, Nijmegen, 6525 HG, The Netherlands. s.mares@ggnet.nl.
Group schema therapy (GST) may be more effective and cost-effective than enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT-E) for patients with eating disorders (EDs) not responding to initial CBT-E. This study will compare GST and CBT-E in a multicenter trial.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
- Health Economics
Background:
- Eating disorders (EDs) like Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and Bulimia Nervosa (BN) present significant treatment challenges and socioeconomic burdens.
- Enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT-E) is a standard treatment, but its efficacy may be limited for patients not showing rapid improvement.
- Group schema therapy (GST) shows promise for EDs, yet requires further evidence, particularly regarding cost-effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of GST versus CBT-E for (atypical) AN and BN patients unresponsive to initial CBT-E.
- To conduct process evaluations for both GST and CBT-E to understand treatment implementation and patient experiences.
- To provide guidance for optimizing ED care trajectories based on comparative treatment outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 232 Dutch patients with (atypical) AN or BN referred for CBT-E.
- Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and at 6 and 12 months follow-up.
- Process evaluations including patient experiences and adherence to protocol, alongside qualitative interviews for quality of life and goal achievement.
Main Results:
- Hypothesizes GST will be superior to CBT-E in clinical and cost-effectiveness for the target patient group.
- Data analysis will employ regression-based mixed modeling, multivariate sensitivity analyses, and qualitative coding.
Conclusions:
- This is the first multicenter RCT protocol designed to compare GST and CBT-E for non-rapid responders in ED treatment.
- The study protocol outlines potential risks and aims to inform healthcare stakeholders on optimizing ED treatment pathways.
- Expected findings will contribute to evidence-based decision-making in eating disorder care.
Related Concept Videos
Group Therapy
Binge Eating Disorders
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Electroconvulsive Therapy

