Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation01:20

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation

5.7K
Cell separation was first achieved in 1964 by S. H. Seal, who separated large tumor cells from the smaller blood cells using filtration. Two years later, Pohl and Hawk performed experiments on how cells respond differently to a nonuniform electric field based on the cell type. Such observations were the inception of cell separation methods, which allow isolating a single cell type from a heterogeneous sample.
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CytoScan: Automated Detection of Technical Anomalies for Cytometry Quality Control.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2026
Same author

Reliable Molecular Retrieval from Mass Spectra Using Conformal Prediction.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Automated Computational Flow Cytometry Correlates Decreasing Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio to Improved Survival in NSCLC After Immune Checkpoint Blockade.

Cancer immunology research·2026
Same author

CompensAID: An Automated Detection Tool for Reference Errors.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2026
Same author

Cross-species cellular mapping and humanization of Fcγ receptors to advance antibody modeling.

Science immunology·2026
Same author

PIDgeon: An Explainable AI Model for Improved Flow Cytometry-Based Screening of Lymphoid Primary Immunodeficiencies.

Clinical chemistry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues
10:12

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues

Published on: January 10, 2019

18.5K

Uncertainty-aware single-cell annotation with a hierarchical reject option.

Lauren Theunissen1,2,3, Thomas Mortier1, Yvan Saeys2,3

  • 1Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|March 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Hierarchical classifiers improve cell type annotation by using partial rejection, preserving more label information than full rejection. Careful threshold selection is key for optimal performance in RNA-seq data analysis.

More Related Videos

Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells
11:26

Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells

Published on: May 22, 2017

13.8K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Strategies for Successful Immune Response Against Tumors
05:58

Author Spotlight: Exploring Strategies for Successful Immune Response Against Tumors

Published on: August 16, 2024

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues
10:12

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues

Published on: January 10, 2019

18.5K
Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells
11:26

Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells

Published on: May 22, 2017

13.8K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Strategies for Successful Immune Response Against Tumors
05:58

Author Spotlight: Exploring Strategies for Successful Immune Response Against Tumors

Published on: August 16, 2024

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Automatic cell type annotation uses RNA-seq data to label cells.
  • Gene expression features have limited resolution, causing annotation uncertainty.
  • Current methods often use full rejection to handle uncertainty, but this can discard valuable information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate different rejection strategies for automatic cell type annotation.
  • To compare flat versus hierarchical classifiers with various rejection approaches.
  • To establish best practices for handling annotation uncertainty in RNA-seq datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated three annotation approaches: full rejection, partial rejection, and no rejection.
  • Compared flat and hierarchical probabilistic classifiers.
  • Analyzed classifier performance based on rejection strategies and thresholding.

Main Results:

  • Hierarchical classifiers outperform flat classifiers when rejection is applied.
  • Partial rejection is the preferred approach, retaining significant label information.
  • Without rejection, flat and hierarchical methods perform similarly if the hierarchy reflects transcriptomic relationships.
  • Optimal rejection thresholds require careful examination of method-specific rejection behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Hierarchical models with partial rejection offer a robust strategy for cell type annotation.
  • The choice of rejection strategy and threshold significantly impacts annotation accuracy and information preservation.
  • Further research into optimizing rejection mechanisms is warranted for advancing single-cell RNA-seq analysis.