Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

17.7K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
17.7K
Next-generation Sequencing03:00

Next-generation Sequencing

88.8K
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
88.8K
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs01:05

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs

15.1K
A single nucleotide polymorphism or SNP is a single nucleotide variation at a specific genomic position in a large population. It is the most prevalent type of sequence variation found in the human genome. Point mutations that occur in more than 1% of the population qualify as SNPs. These are present once every 1000 nucleotides on an average in the human genome. Replacement of a purine with another purine (A/G) or a pyrimidine with another pyrimidine (C/T) is known as a transition. In contrast,...
15.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contexts.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Small interfering RNA-mediated silencing of mutant NPM1 suppresses acute myeloid leukemia via reversing KAT7 and p300-mediated histone acetylation.

Leukemia·2026
Same author

Author Correction: The transcriptional coactivator TAZ regulates reciprocal differentiation of T<sub>H</sub>17 cells and T<sub>reg</sub> cells.

Nature immunology·2026
Same author

RNF213 isoform 2 restricts Zika virus through antiviral signaling and viral protein degradation.

iScience·2026
Same author

A Low-SNR DOA Estimation Model Based on Sequential and Convolutional Feature Fusion.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

A Two-Stage Transformer Framework for Sparse-Array Direction-of-Arrival Estimation via Correlation Vector Recovery.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

962

NPSV-deep: a deep learning method for genotyping structural variants in short read genome sequencing data.

Michael D Linderman1, Jacob Wallace1, Alderik van der Heyde1

  • 1Department of Computer Science, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, United States.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|March 6, 2024
PubMed
Summary

NPSV-deep improves structural variant genotyping accuracy using short-read sequencing data by treating the task as an image similarity problem. This deep learning method enhances variant calls, reducing errors and improving genetic variation understanding.

More Related Videos

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

13.0K
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

962
Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

13.0K
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Structural variants (SVs) are crucial in disease but challenging to genotype accurately using short-read sequencing (SRS).
  • Improving SV genotyping in SRS data is vital for understanding genetic variation, especially for variants initially identified by long-read sequencing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate NPSV-deep, a novel deep learning approach for accurate genotyping of insertion and deletion structural variants using SRS data.
  • To enhance the accuracy of structural variant genotyping, particularly for variants identified through long-read sequencing.

Main Methods:

  • NPSV-deep employs a deep learning model that frames structural variant genotyping as an image similarity problem.
  • It predicts genotypes by comparing pileup images from actual SRS data with simulated SRS data for known variants.
  • The approach leverages similarity metrics between these image representations.

Main Results:

  • NPSV-deep consistently matches or surpasses state-of-the-art methods in SV genotyping accuracy across diverse datasets and variant types.
  • Demonstrated a 25% reduction in genotyping errors for Genome-in-a-Bottle (GIAB) high-confidence SVs.
  • Achieved a 1.5 percentage point improvement in deletion genotyping concordance for GIAB SVs (reaching 92%) through automatic correction of imprecise variant descriptions.

Conclusions:

  • NPSV-deep offers a significant advancement in structural variant genotyping accuracy from short-read sequencing data.
  • The method's ability to refine variant descriptions enhances its utility and broadens the scope of accurate SV analysis.
  • This tool has the potential to improve our understanding of the role of structural variants in human diseases.