Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in ischemic heart disease: to operate or not? A meta-analysis
Razan A Alsuayri1, Abdullah K Alassiri2, Ahmed K Awad3
1Batterjee Medical College for Sciences and Technology, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Insights
For ischemic mitral regurgitation, combining coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with mitral valve repair (MVR) showed no significant difference in one-year mortality, stroke, or heart failure hospitalization compared to CABG alone. Personalized treatment is key.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Ischemic mitral regurgitation is common in patients with coronary artery disease.
- The decision between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone or with mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation is challenging.
- Unfavorable outcomes have been linked to ischemic mitral regurgitation post-CABG, but the benefit of concurrent mitral valve repair remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze clinical outcomes comparing CABG alone versus CABG with mitral valve surgery.
- To determine if combining CABG with mitral valve repair improves results over CABG alone for ischemic mitral regurgitation.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of six randomized clinical trials.
- Searched PubMed and Google Scholar for studies comparing CABG versus CABG with mitral valve replacement (MVR).
- Analyzed data from 852 patients.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found between CABG alone and CABG+MVR regarding one-year mortality, stroke, atrial fibrillation, or heart failure hospitalization.
- A trend towards higher risk of recurrent/residual mitral regurgitation was observed with CABG+MVR (RR=5.42, P=0.065), with significant heterogeneity (I²=66%).
- No significant heterogeneity was identified for other major outcomes.
Conclusions:
- CABG alone and CABG+MVR yielded similar clinical results in the studied population.
- The findings emphasize the necessity for individualized treatment strategies in managing ischemic mitral regurgitation.
- Patient-specific factors should guide the decision between isolated CABG and combined CABG with MVR.
Introduction:
Deciding whether to perform coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone or in combination with mitral valve repair is a common dilemma encountered by surgeons when treating patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation, a common condition related to coronary artery disease. Although ischemic mitral regurgitation after CABG has been linked to unfavorable results, the benefits of including mitral valve repair are still unknown. This discrepancy led us to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether combining CABG with mitral valve surgery leads to better clinical results than CABG alone.
Evidence Acquisition:
Studies comparing the results of CABG versus CABG with mitral valve replacement were searched in the databases of PubMed and Google Scholar. There were six randomized clinical trials included in this study.
Evidence Synthesis:
We analyzed 852 patients' data. There were no significant variations between patients who acquired CABG alone or CABG+(MVR) in terms of their risk of death at one year, stroke, atrial fibrillation, or hospitalization for heart failure. For recurrent/residual mitral regurgitation; it revealed an RR=5.42, 95% CI, 0.77 to 37.98, and a P value of =0.065. According to the analysis of study heterogeneity, no apparent heterogeneity was identified in the outcomes of death after one year, stroke, atrial fibrillation, or hospitalization for heart failure. However, the outcome of recurrent or residual mitral regurgitation showed significant variation (I2=66%).
Conclusions:
Patients who underwent CABG alone versus CABG plus MVR did not differ significantly from one another. However, the comparison of CABG alone with CABG plus MVR underlines the need for customized treatment plans based on the unique characteristics of each patient.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

