Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Three-dimensional Particle Tracking Velocimetry for Turbulence Applications: Case of a Jet Flow
Published on: February 27, 2016
A rapidly time-varying equatorial jet in Jupiter's deep interior
Jeremy Bloxham1, Hao Cao2,3, David J Stevenson4
1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. jeremy_bloxham@harvard.edu.
Abstract:
Planetary magnetic fields provide a window into the otherwise largely inaccessible dynamics of a planet's deep interior. In particular, interaction between fluid flow in electrically conducting interior regions and the magnetic field there gives rise to observable secular variation (time dependency) of the externally observed magnetic field. Secular variation of Jupiter's field has recently been revealed1-3 and been shown to arise, in part, from an axisymmetric, equatorial jet2. Whether this jet is time dependent has not previously been addressed, yet it is of critical importance for understanding the dynamics of the planet's interior. If steady, it would probably be a manifestation of deep dynamo convective flow (and jets are anticipated as part of that flow4-9) but if time dependent on a timescale much shorter than the convective turnover timescale of several hundred years, it would probably have a different origin. Here we show that the jet has a wavelike fluctuation with a period of roughly 4 years, strongly suggestive of the presence of a torsional oscillation10 (a cylindrically symmetric oscillating flow about the rotation axis) or a localized Alfvén wave in Jupiter's metallic hydrogen interior. This opens a pathway towards revealing otherwise hidden aspects of the magnetic field within the metallic hydrogen region and hence constraining the dynamo that generates Jupiter's magnetic field.
Related Concept Videos
General External Flow Characteristics
Couette Flow
Rapidly Varying Flow
Irrotational Flow
Pressure Variation in a Fluid at Rest
When measuring pressure at two different levels within the fluid, the difference in...
Magnetostatic Boundary Conditions

