Influence of different intraoperative fluid management on postoperative outcome after abdominal tumours resection
- Matej Jenko 1,2, Katarina Mencin 1,2, Vesna Novak-Jankovic 1,2, Alenka Spindler-Vesel 1,2
- Matej Jenko 1,2, Katarina Mencin 1,2, Vesna Novak-Jankovic 1,2
- 1Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.
- 2Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
- 0Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Intraoperative multimodal monitoring in major abdominal surgery did not reduce hospital stay or morbidity. However, it did lead to improved fluid management and a lower postoperative procalcitonin level, indicating a potential impact on immune response.
Area Of Science
- Anesthesiology
- Surgical Oncology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background
- Intraoperative fluid management is critical in major abdominal surgeries like colorectal and pancreatoduodenectomy.
- Optimizing fluid balance aims to reduce postoperative complications and hospital stay.
- Multimodal monitoring may offer enhanced insights into patient status during surgery.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate if intraoperative multimodal monitoring reduces postoperative morbidity and hospitalisation duration.
- To compare outcomes between standard monitoring and advanced multimodal monitoring in high-risk surgical patients.
- To investigate the impact of monitoring strategies on inflammatory markers.
Main Methods
- Prospective study with two parallel groups: control (standard monitoring) and protocol (multimodal monitoring).
- Inclusion of high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
- Randomized allocation to either standard monitoring (44 patients) or multimodal monitoring (44 patients).
Main Results
- No significant difference in median hospital stay (9 days) between groups.
- No difference observed in postoperative renal or cardiac impairment.
- Significantly higher procalcitonin levels in the control group (0.75 mcg/L) compared to the protocol group (0.3 mcg/L).
- Protocol group received significantly more intraoperative fluid (median +1300 ml vs +375 ml).
Conclusions
- Intraoperative multimodal monitoring led to significant differences in fluid management and vasopressor use.
- Higher procalcitonin in the control group suggests altered immune response related to fluid status.
- No observed benefit in reducing postoperative morbidity or hospital stay with multimodal monitoring.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

