Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Training of Laboratory Animals for Gentle and Stress-Free Handling
Published on: February 16, 2024
A structured, journal-led peer-review mentoring program enhances peer review training
Ariel Maia Lyons-Warren1, Whitley W Aamodt2, Kathleen M Pieper3
1Department of Pediatrics, Section of Neurology; Clinical Care Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA. lyonswar@bcm.edu.
A structured mentored peer-review program significantly improved trainee skills and confidence in manuscript review. This training enhances understanding of publication science and leads to high mentor satisfaction.
Area of Science:
- Scientific Publishing
- Academic Medicine
- Research Integrity
Background:
- Peer review is crucial for scientific advancement but lacks standardized training.
- Current peer review training methods are often unorganized and understudied.
- A structured approach to peer review training is needed to improve quality and consistency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured mentored peer-review program.
- To assess improvements in peer review skills using quantitative and qualitative measures.
- To determine the impact of mentorship on trainee understanding of the publication process.
Main Methods:
- A pre-post intervention study involving 55 mentees across 5 cohorts (2020-2023).
- Mentees underwent 2 mentored reviews over 6 months, with pre- and post-program assessments.
- Outcomes included the modified Review Quality Index (mRQI), mentee self-perception surveys, and mentor satisfaction.
Main Results:
- Mentees showed significant improvement in mRQI scores post-program (median 31 vs. 26.6).
- Self-perceived understanding of review and editorial processes, and confidence in manuscript review, increased significantly (p < 0.0001).
- Mentors reported high satisfaction with the program, enjoyment, and interest in repeat participation.
Conclusions:
- A 6-month structured mentored peer-review program effectively enhances peer review training.
- The program improves the quality of reviews as measured by mRQI and boosts mentee confidence.
- High mentor satisfaction indicates the program's feasibility and positive impact on the scientific community.
Related Concept Videos
Proofreading
Long-term Potentiation
Feedback Loops
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Feedback Inhibition
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

