Falls From Heights: A Retrospective Review of Roof Fall-Related Trauma

Background Falls from roofs (FFRs), while constituting just a segment of all falls, pose a significant public health issue. They not only impact individuals in their daily lives but also pose an increased risk in the construction field. The consequences of these falls range broadly, from minor bruises to serious harm, potentially leading to chronic disability or fatality. For the general populace, such falls might happen during simple activities like maintenance, with outcomes varying from fractures to critical head or spinal injuries. In construction, where elevated work is the norm, the likelihood and potential severity of falls are significantly greater. Construction workers face the threat of falls regularly, with these mishaps often resulting in enduring disabilities that affect both life quality and work capability. Methodology This study presents data from a trauma registry system, covering trauma admissions from March 31, 2016, to December 27, 2021, at a level 1 trauma center (Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, CA). During this five-year and eight-month period, a total of 3,148 patients presented to the emergency department after a fall. This study focuses on patients admitted after an FFR. A retrospective analysis of this data showed that out of these 3,148 patients, 75 presented after an FFR. Results In this retrospective analysis of 75 patients presenting to the emergency department after an FFR, the patient profile was predominantly male (70, 93%), with an average age of 51 years. Hospitalization was required for the majority of the patients (70, 93%), with a third necessitating intensive care unit (ICU) care. The necessity for surgical procedures was high at 57 (76%). Upon discharge, 8 (11%) patients were moved to acute rehabilitation. Injuries to the extremities were most common, accounting for 21% (36) of cases, in contrast to facial injuries at 8% (15). Upper extremity fractures were the most prevalent presenting injury at 31% (50), while lower extremity fractures were the least at 6% (9). The overall Injury Severity Score (ISS) averaged 12, with patients having hospital length of stays (LOSs) over 10 days presenting higher ISS scores (18) compared to those with shorter stays (ISS of 11). There was no significant difference in ISS between patients aged 60 and above compared to younger patients. Conclusions FFRs represent a substantial cause of injury in both the construction industry and residential settings. This study aims to provide an overview and summary of the existing literature on FFRs, present effective fall prevention methods, and underscore the considerable consequences of such injuries on both construction workers and homeowners. Additionally, it includes an analysis of a dataset detailing injuries resulting from roof-related falls, offering a comparison to existing research.