Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Controlling Parkinson's Disease With Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation
Published on: July 16, 2014
Effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation using different frequency programming paradigms on axial
Yifeng Cheng1,2, Guangrui Zhao2, Lei Chen3
1Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Background:
In advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), axial symptoms are common and can be debilitating. Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) significantly improves motor symptoms, conventional high-frequency stimulation (HFS) has limited effectiveness in improving axial symptoms. In this study, we investigated the effects on multiple axial symptoms after DBS surgery with three different frequency programming paradigms comprising HFS, low-frequency stimulation (LFS), and variable-frequency stimulation (VFS).
Methods:
This study involved PD patients who had significant preoperative axial symptoms and underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. Axial symptoms, motor symptoms, medications, and quality of life were evaluated preoperatively (baseline). One month after surgery, HFS was applied. At 6 months post-surgery, HFS assessments were performed, and HFS was switched to LFS. A further month later, we conducted LFS assessments and switched LFS to VFS. At 8 months after surgery, VFS assessments were performed.
Results:
Of the 21 PD patients initially enrolled, 16 patients were ultimately included in this study. Regarding HFS, all axial symptoms except for the Berg Balance Scale (p < 0.0001) did not improve compared with the baseline (all p > 0.05). As for LFS and VFS, all axial symptoms improved significantly compared with both the baseline and HFS (all p < 0.05). Moreover, motor symptoms and medications were significantly better than the baseline (all p < 0.05) after using LFS and VFS. Additionally, the quality of life of the PD patients after receiving LFS and VFS was significantly better than at the baseline and with HFS (all p < 0.0001).
Conclusion:
Our findings indicate that HFS is ineffective at improving the majority of axial symptoms in advanced PD. However, both the LFS and VFS programming paradigms exhibit significant improvements in various axial symptoms.
More Related Videos
07:14A Novel Approach to Assess Motor Outcome of Deep Brain Stimulation Effects in the Hemiparkinsonian Rat: Staircase and Cylinder Test
Published on: May 31, 2016
14:14Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models
Published on: August 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Parkinson's Disease: Treatment
Parkinson's Disease is primarily a result of the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. The cornerstone of...
Parkinson's Disease: Overview
Neural Regulation