Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
Published on: July 31, 2016
Children's shyness and early stages of emotional face processing
Kristie L Poole1, Teena Willoughby1
1Brock University, Canada.
Insights
Shy children show distinct brain responses to angry and fearful faces. Higher shyness correlates with early brain wave (P100) changes, while lower shyness relates to later brain wave (N170) changes when viewing threat cues.
Area of Science:
- Developmental psychology
- Cognitive neuroscience
- Social neuroscience
Background:
- Early facial emotion recognition is crucial for social interaction.
- Individual differences in temperament, like shyness, may impact this development.
- Limited research exists on how shyness influences early emotional face processing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between temperamental shyness and early neural processing of facial emotions in children.
- To examine how shyness affects event-related potentials (P100 and N170) in response to neutral, angry, fearful, and happy facial expressions.
- To determine if shyness specifically influences the processing of threat-related facial cues.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a sample of 419 children (mean age 10.57 years).
- Assessed temperamental shyness.
- Measured early emotional face processing using P100 and N170 event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to various facial expressions (neutral, anger, fear, happy).
Main Results:
- Higher temperamental shyness was associated with increased P100 activation to angry and fearful faces compared to neutral faces.
- Lower temperamental shyness was associated with increased N170 activation to angry and fearful faces compared to neutral faces.
- No significant relations were found between temperamental shyness and P100 or N170 responses to happy faces relative to neutral faces, indicating specificity to threat cues.
Conclusions:
- Temperamental shyness is linked to distinct patterns of neural activation during the early stages of processing threat-related facial emotions in children.
- Findings suggest that shy children may exhibit specific neural responses to anger and fear cues, potentially reflecting heightened sensitivity or different processing strategies.
- The specificity to threat-related faces highlights the importance of considering emotional valence when examining the influence of temperament on face processing.
Abstract:
The ability to detect and recognize facial emotions emerges in childhood and is important for understanding social cues, but we know relatively little about how individual differences in temperament may influence early emotional face processing. We used a sample of 419 children (Mage = 10.57 years, SD = 1.75; 48% female; 77% White) to examine the relation between temperamental shyness and early stages of emotional face processing (assessed using the P100 and N170 event-related potentials) during different facial expressions (neutral, anger, fear, and happy). We found that higher temperamental shyness was related to greater P100 activation to faces expressing anger and fear relative to neutral faces. Further, lower temperamental shyness was related to greater N170 activation to faces expressing anger and fear relative to neutral faces. There were no relations between temperamental shyness and neural activation to happy faces relative to neutral faces for P100 or N170, suggesting specificity to faces signaling threat. We discuss findings in the context of understanding the early processing of facial emotional display of threat among shy children.
More Related Videos
08:09Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood
Published on: February 11, 2017
13:08Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
Published on: December 2, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Empathy
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Cognitive Development During Adolescence