Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
Published on: April 14, 2014
Visual evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: P100 latency and visual pathway damage including the lateral
Athina Papadopoulou1, Armanda Pfister2, Charidimos Tsagkas3
1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Switzerland; Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINK) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Visual evoked potential (VEP) P100 latency in multiple sclerosis (MS) is linked to damage throughout the visual pathway. In patients with optic neuritis (ON), lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) damage also impacts VEP P100 latency.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Ophthalmology
- Neurology
Background:
- Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease affecting the central nervous system.
- Visual pathway damage is common in MS, impacting visual evoked potentials (VEP).
- The P100 component of VEP reflects visual pathway integrity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between P100 latency in VEP and both pre- and postchiasmatic damage in MS patients.
- To identify specific anatomical structures associated with P100 latency delays.
Main Methods:
- VEP, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and MRI were performed on 31 MS patients and 31 controls.
- Associations were tested between P100 latency and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), ganglion cell/inner plexiform layers (GCIPL), lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) volume, optic radiation white matter lesions (OR-WML), non-lesional optic radiation fractional anisotropy (NAOR-FA), and primary visual cortex (V1) thickness.
- Effect sizes were quantified using marginal R-squared (mR²).
Main Results:
- MS patients showed significant differences in P100 latency, pRNFL, GCIPL, and LGN compared to controls.
- P100 latency was strongly associated with GCIPL (mR²=0.26) and moderately with OR-WML (mR²=0.17), NAOR-FA (mR²=0.13), and pRNFL (mR²=0.08).
- Multivariate analysis revealed GCIPL and NAOR-FA as significant predictors of P100 latency (mR²=0.41). In ON patients, LGN volume was significantly associated with P100 latency (mR²=-0.56).
Conclusions:
- P100 latency is influenced by damage in both anterior and posterior parts of the visual pathway in MS.
- In MS patients with prior optic neuritis, damage at the synaptic level in the LGN may contribute to delayed P100 latency.
- These findings support the role of post-chiasmatic structures in VEP signal generation and highlight distinct pathophysiological mechanisms in MS.
Related Concept Videos
Vision
Visual Agnosia
Multiple Sclerosis l: Introduction

