Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026
Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
Corpus Callosum Length and Cerebellar Vermian Height in Fetal Growth Restriction
Manesha Putra1, Odessa P Hamidi2, Camille Driver1
1Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Introduction:
Growth-restricted fetuses may have changes in their neuroanatomical structures that can be detected in prenatal imaging. We aim to compare corpus callosal length (CCL) and cerebellar vermian height (CVH) measurements between fetal growth restriction (FGR) and control fetuses and to correlate them with cerebral Doppler velocimetry in growth-restricted fetuses.
Methods:
This was a prospective cohort of FGR after 20 weeks of gestation with ultrasound measurements of CCL and CVH. Control cohort was assembled from fetuses without FGR who had growth ultrasound after 20 weeks of gestation. We compared differences of CCL or CVH between FGR and controls. We also tested for the correlations of CCL and CVH with middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index (PI) and vertebral artery (VA) PI in the FGR group. CCL and CVH measurements were adjusted by head circumference (HC).
Results:
CCL and CVH were obtained in 68 and 55 fetuses, respectively. CCL/HC was smaller in FGR fetuses when compared to control fetuses (difference = 0.03, 95% CI: [0.02, 0.04], p < 0.001). CVH/HC was larger in FGR fetuses compared to NG fetuses (difference = 0.1, 95% CI: [-0.01, 0.02], p = < 0.001). VA PI multiples of the median were inversely correlated with CVH/HC (rho = -0.53, p = 0.007), while CCL/HC was not correlated with VA PI. Neither CCL/HC nor CVH/HC was correlated with MCA PI.
Conclusions:
CCL/HC and CVH/HC measurements show differences in growth-restricted fetuses compared to a control cohort. We also found an inverse relationship between VA PI and CVH/HC. The potential use of neurosonography assessment in FGR assessment requires continued explorations.
