Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026
Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation
Published on: September 18, 2012
En Face and Volumetric Comparison of Hypertransmission Defects Evaluated by Cirrus and Spectralis Optical Coherence
Jiwon Baek1, Maryam Ashrafkhorasani2, Alireza Mahmoudi3
1From the Doheny Eye Institute (J.B., M.A., A.M., M.G.N., G.C., S.R.S.), Pasadena, California, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea (J.B.), Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea; Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea (J.B.), Seoul, South Korea; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (J.B., A.M., G.C., S.R.S.), Los Angeles, California, USA.
Purpose:
To evaluate and compare en face and 3-dimensional (3-D) properties of hypertransmission defects (HTDs) between different optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices using OCT volumes and reconstructed en face images.
Settings:
Comparative diagnostic evaluation study.
Methods:
Thirty eyes with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) that underwent dense OCT macular volume scans with both the Spectralis (97 B-scans/volume; 2910 B-scans in total) and Cirrus OCT (128 B-scans/volume; 3840 B-scans in total) from the Amish Eye Study cohort were included in this analysis. HTD regions were labeled on each B-scan and reconstructed into en face and 3-D volume images. Properties of HTD volume were compared between the 2 devices.
Results:
The qualitative score of en face images for HTD was higher for the Cirrus compared to the Spectralis (P < .01). The quality of Spectralis en face images improved after preprocessing and reconstruction. The 2-D HTD area on en face obtained from 2-D projections of 3-D volume did not differ between devices (P = .478, ICC = 0.998; Jaccard index 0.721 ± 0.086). There was no difference in the number, volume, PALs, and surface areas of HTDs between devices in the volumetric analysis (all P ≥ .090). The signal intensity of HTD normalized by the mean choroidal signal intensity did not differ between devices (P = .861).
Conclusions:
The visualization of HTD on en face images from Spectralis OCT could be enhanced through image processing. The equivalence in 3-D HTD parameters between the 2 devices suggests interchangeability for assessing these lesions in AMD.
More Related Videos
12:22Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy oSLO and Optical Coherence Tomography OCT
Published on: August 4, 2018
06:15Author Spotlight: Anterior HR-OCT as a Non-Invasive Tool for Characterizing Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
01:26Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...
01:10Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
01:27Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography