Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

100
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
100
Controls in Experiments01:13

Controls in Experiments

7.7K
When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...
7.7K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

169
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
169
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

126
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
126
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

217
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
217

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of the researcher-led "Peerspectives" peer review training course on review quality, knowledge, and skills among doctoral students in the biomedical sciences: a pre-post study.

Research integrity and peer review·2026
Same author

Counterfactual Harm: A Counter-argument.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Causal Inference in Studies with Functional Unmasking: Psychedelics and Beyond.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Choosing a sensible contrast makes "prevalence bias" irrelevant in screening colonoscopy trials.

European journal of epidemiology·2025
Same author

Effect of Mobile Stroke Unit Dispatch on Process Parameters and Functional Outcomes in Patients With Acute Stroke: The B_PROUD-2.0 Study.

Neurology·2025
Same journal

Temporal Connectivity of Social Contact Networks in Urban and Rural India.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Indoor Radon Concentrations and Hematologic Traits in the Women's Health Initiative.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Non-random selection with and without bias due to selecting on an exposure.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Using Negative Control Populations to Assess Unmeasured Confounding and Direct Effects.

Marco Piccininni1,2,3, Mats Julius Stensrud4

  • 1From the Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|March 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Negative control populations help identify unbiased treatment effects. Mobile stroke units improve functional outcomes in suspected stroke patients, as shown by this study.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.9K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.9K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Causal inference
  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical research

Background:

  • Treatment effects can be absent in specific population subgroups, termed negative control populations.
  • These subgroups are valuable for detecting bias and confounding in research.
  • Examples include penicillin resistance and CYP2D6 enzyme polymorphisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present formal criteria for using negative control populations to rule out unmeasured confounding and direct causal effects.
  • To demonstrate the applicability of negative control populations across diverse research settings.
  • To evaluate the impact of mobile stroke units on patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Formal criteria development for negative control population utilization.
  • Application of negative control populations in clinical and epidemiological studies.
  • Case study analysis of mobile stroke unit dispatches using trial data.

Main Results:

  • Formal criteria were established to justify the use of negative control populations.
  • Negative control populations are applicable in various research fields, including infectious diseases and public health.
  • Mobile stroke unit dispatches were found to improve functional outcomes in individuals with suspected stroke.

Conclusions:

  • Negative control populations provide a rigorous method for assessing causal effects and ruling out bias.
  • The study supports the effectiveness of mobile stroke units in improving functional outcomes for stroke patients.
  • Further research can leverage negative control populations to enhance the validity of causal claims.