Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

100
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
100
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

169
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
169
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

265
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
265
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring population heterogeneity requires heterogeneous populations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

What Makes Non-Directed Living Kidney Donors Tick? Actionable Items to Increase Non-Directed Live Organ Donation.

Clinical transplantation·2024
Same author

Dark defaults: How choice architecture steers political campaign donations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Structural parameter interdependencies in computational models of cognition.

Psychological review·2021
Same author

Author Correction: A consensus-based transparency checklist.

Nature human behaviour·2019
Same author

A consensus-based transparency checklist.

Nature human behaviour·2019
Same journal

Tau protein as a regulator of mitochondrial function and dynamics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

A scalable, dividing cell model for the robust propagation and quantification of human sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Epigenetic regulation of mesenchymal BMP signaling directs postnatal organ innervation.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Single-shot wide-field biochemical imaging at 1 kHz frame rate.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Morphogenesis and topological evolution of a frustrated nematic liquid crystal under confinement.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

B cell-intrinsic CXCR3 drives efficient generation of ectopic pulmonary germinal center responses to influenza A virus infection.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.9K

Exposing omitted moderators: Explaining why effect sizes differ in the social sciences.

Antonia Krefeld-Schwalb1, Eli Rosen Sugerman2, Eric J Johnson2

  • 1Rotterdam School of Management, Department of Marketing Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam 3011 LC, Netherlands.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|March 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Behavioral science interventions show varied effects across different people and situations. A new framework identifies key factors like intelligence and attentiveness that explain these differences, improving intervention predictability.

Keywords:
choice architecturemoderatorsonline data collection

More Related Videos

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.0K
Moderate Prenatal Alcohol Exposure and Quantification of Social Behavior in Adult Rats
11:01

Moderate Prenatal Alcohol Exposure and Quantification of Social Behavior in Adult Rats

Published on: December 14, 2014

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.9K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.0K
Moderate Prenatal Alcohol Exposure and Quantification of Social Behavior in Adult Rats
11:01

Moderate Prenatal Alcohol Exposure and Quantification of Social Behavior in Adult Rats

Published on: December 14, 2014

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Social and Behavioral Sciences
  • Psychology
  • Public Policy

Background:

  • Policymakers increasingly use behavioral science for global challenges like climate change and health crises.
  • A significant challenge is the inconsistent effectiveness of behavioral interventions across diverse contexts and individuals.
  • Understanding this heterogeneity is crucial for optimizing intervention design and implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the heterogeneity of behavioral science intervention effects across different underlying paradigms.
  • To develop and apply a framework for modeling and measuring typically omitted moderators of intervention effectiveness.
  • To provide a theoretical and empirical basis for predicting and understanding variations in intervention effect sizes.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted five preregistered studies with over 11,000 participants across in-person and online settings.
  • Investigated heterogeneity in intervention effects for various behavioral science paradigms.
  • Developed a framework incorporating factors such as Fluid Intelligence, Attentiveness, Crystallized Intelligence, and Experience.

Main Results:

  • Substantial heterogeneity in intervention effects was observed across different settings and paradigms.
  • The developed framework identified key moderators (Fluid Intelligence, Attentiveness, Crystallized Intelligence, Experience) that influence intervention effectiveness.
  • These moderators explained variations in observed effect sizes and were associated with effect sizes through manipulation intensity and direct effects.

Conclusions:

  • The effectiveness of behavioral interventions is highly variable and influenced by individual and contextual factors.
  • The proposed framework offers a robust method for identifying and measuring crucial moderators, enhancing the predictability of intervention outcomes.
  • These findings are vital for advancing the application of behavioral science in policy and research by providing a clearer understanding of intervention variability.