Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination01:28

Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination

Meaning of Cystoscopic Examination:Cystoscopy is an essential diagnostic tool in urology that is used to assess the structure and function of the genitourinary system. It provides a direct view of the urethra, bladder, and, in some cases, the ureteral openings. This procedure helps detect structural abnormalities, infections, cancers, and blockages in the urinary tract. There are two types of cystoscopy:Flexible cystoscopy is commonly performed in outpatient settings due to its less invasive...
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry01:19

Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry

Uroflowmetry is a non-invasive urodynamic test designed to measure various aspects of urination, including volume, flow rate, and the time to void. This test is crucial for diagnosing and assessing conditions such as bladder outlet obstruction, bladder dysfunction, incomplete bladder emptying, incontinence, and urinary tract blockages caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and urethral strictures.Pre-Test Instructions:Before a uroflowmetry test, patients are typically advised to drink...
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography01:22

Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography

IntroductionIntravenous Urography (IVU) and Retrograde Pyelography (RP) are important diagnostic imaging techniques used to evaluate the urinary system. These methods help identify structural abnormalities, obstructions, and functional issues in the kidneys, ureters, and bladder. Both procedures use iodine-based contrast media to enhance the visibility of urinary tract structures on X-ray images, though they differ in their methods and indications.1. Intravenous Urography (IVU)Intravenous...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:27

Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Introduction:Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or MRI, can include a specialized imaging technique of the urinary system known as Magnetic Resonance Urography (MRU). This radiation-free technique uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves to produce detailed images with the help of a computer. MRU is particularly effective for visualizing fluid-filled structures like the kidneys, ureters, and bladder.Applications of MRI in the Genitourinary SystemKidneys and Ureters: MRI detects tumors, cysts,...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography01:24

Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

IntroductionUltrasonography, or renal ultrasound, is a noninvasive medical imaging technique that uses high-frequency sound waves to visualize the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and surrounding tissues.Indications for Urinary System UltrasonographyUrinary system ultrasonography is indicated in various clinical scenarios, such as:Kidney Stones (Urolithiasis): To detect and monitor the size and presence of kidney or urinary tract stones.Hydronephrosis: To assess the dilation of the renal pelvis and...
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies01:28

Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies

Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder (KUB) StudiesKidney, Ureter, and Bladder (KUB) studies are standard diagnostic imaging procedures used to assess the anatomy of the urinary system. They are commonly utilized for patients experiencing abdominal pain or urinary symptoms. By using a simple X-ray of the abdomen, KUB studies can reveal structural and pathological abnormalities within the kidneys, ureters, and bladder. These studies are particularly valuable in diagnosing kidney stones, urinary...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why Renal Cancer Guidelines Should be Tailored to Histologic Subtype.

European urology oncology·2026
Same author

Letter: Minimally Invasive Partial Versus Radical Nephrectomy for cT2 RCC: A National Matched-Pair Analysis.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same author

RE: What makes a great urology sub-internship? A survey of medical students, residents, and faculty.

BJU international·2026
Same author

Preoperative predictors of adverse pathology and recurrence-free survival for patients with renal masses.

BJUI compass·2026
Same author

Broad spectrum antimicrobial nanoparticles with low toxicity to prevent biofilm formation on urologic devices.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Histologic Patterns and Germline Genetic Testing Outcomes in Presumed Sporadic Bilateral Renal Masses.

Urology practice·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
05:04

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

919

Urology Residency Applicant Selection: Program Directors' New Criteria.

Juan Sebastian Rodriguez-Alvarez1, Carlos Munoz-Lopez2, Samuel Harwood2

  • 1Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Urology
|March 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Urology residency program directors prioritize letters of recommendation and sub-internships. The increased use of preference signals (PS) significantly impacts interview invitations, with most directors feeling recent application changes have worsened the process.

More Related Videos

Urethral Stricture Induction Followed by Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty in a Rat Model
05:09

Urethral Stricture Induction Followed by Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty in a Rat Model

Published on: April 28, 2023

944
Handling and Assessment of Human Primary Prostate Organoid Culture
08:45

Handling and Assessment of Human Primary Prostate Organoid Culture

Published on: January 17, 2019

17.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
05:04

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

919
Urethral Stricture Induction Followed by Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty in a Rat Model
05:09

Urethral Stricture Induction Followed by Buccal Mucosa Graft Urethroplasty in a Rat Model

Published on: April 28, 2023

944
Handling and Assessment of Human Primary Prostate Organoid Culture
08:45

Handling and Assessment of Human Primary Prostate Organoid Culture

Published on: January 17, 2019

17.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Surgical Residency Training

Background:

  • The urology residency application process has undergone recent modifications.
  • Understanding program directors' (PDs) perspectives on these changes is crucial for applicant success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess how recent urology residency application changes affect PDs' interview invitation criteria.
  • To gauge PDs' opinions on the impact of these application process alterations.

Main Methods:

  • An anonymous survey was distributed to 137 urology residency PDs.
  • The survey explored interview selection criteria and the effect of increased preference signals (PS) per applicant.

Main Results:

  • Letters of recommendation (LoR) and successful sub-internships (sub-I) were top criteria.
  • 80.7% of PDs reported a negative impact for applicants not sending a PS; 12.2% would not interview such candidates.
  • 62.1% of PDs believed the recent changes worsened the application process.

Conclusions:

  • Recent changes have altered PDs' applicant evaluations, emphasizing LoRs and sub-Is.
  • Increased preference signals (PS) have amplified their importance, making signaled programs crucial for interview offers.
  • A majority of PDs perceive the recent application process changes negatively.