A Retrospective Observational Study on Telemedicine in Prescribing Low-Dose Pills for Patients with Dysmenorrhea

In Japan, telemedicine has gradually expanded due to deregulation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, its current status remains unclear, as it is primarily provided by general practitioners. Meanwhile, telemedicine has begun to be utilized for low-dose estrogen-progestin (LEP) prescriptions for dysmenorrhea.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical record data from two gynecology clinics and performed an exploratory evaluation between a group that combined telemedicine and in-person visits during the initial 6 months of LEP treatment, and another group with only in-person visits.

After propensity score matching, 89 and 83 patients were eligible for the telemedicine and in-person groups, respectively, with 53 patients in both. The characteristics of both groups were similar after matching. There were no significant differences in the probability of abnormal uterine bleeding during the first 6 months of treatment (25% and 43% in each group; p = 0.064), side effects, or treatment efficacy between the two groups. The withdrawal rate at 6 months was significantly higher in the telemedicine group than in the in-person group (13% and 0%, p = 0.013). The average copayment for patients who covered 30% of the total cost was also significantly higher in the telemedicine group after 1 and 3 months of LEP prescription.

The appropriate combination of telemedicine and in-person visits is currently employed in hospital visits, which does not differ significantly from in-person visits. Given the retrospective nature of this study and the limited number of cases, further investigation is necessary in the future.