Differences between Myeloschisis and Myelomeningocele in Patients Undergoing Prenatal Repair of Open Spina Bifida

José Miguel Müller1, Edgardo Corral Sereño2, Aura Jimenez3

  • 1Neurosurgery Department, Hospital Regional Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins, Rancagua, Chile.

PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Myelomeningocele (MMC) and myeloschisis (MS) are distinct open spina bifida (OSB) subtypes. MS is linked to more severe Chiari II malformations, while MMC is associated with clubfoot, impacting prenatal repair management.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research
  • Pediatric surgery
  • Fetal medicine

Background:

  • Open spina bifida (OSB) presents as myelomeningocele (MMC) or myeloschisis (MS), both potentially causing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and Chiari II malformation (CHMII).
  • Clinical distinctions between MMC and MS in fetuses undergoing prenatal repair remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate clinical and radiological differences between myeloschisis (MS) and myelomeningocele (MMC) in fetuses treated with prenatal open spina bifida (OSB) repair.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 71 prenatal OSB repairs (2012-2022) using open technique.
  • Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and correlation of anthropometric measurements with clinical and imaging variables.

Main Results:

  • Myeloschisis (MS) was associated with a higher incidence of severe Chiari II malformations (CHMII) (80%) compared to myelomeningocele (MMC) (43%).
  • MMC correlated with a higher frequency of clubfoot at birth.
  • Fetuses with smaller atrial diameters (<13.48 mm) showed a reduced need for CSF shunts at 12 months.

Conclusions:

  • Myeloschisis (MS) and myelomeningocele (MMC) represent distinct subtypes of open spina bifida (OSB).
  • Further research with larger cohorts, including biomolecular and histological analyses, is warranted to elucidate differences.
  • Findings can aid healthcare providers in counseling parents and preparing for prenatal OSB repair management.