Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Analyte Adsorption and Distribution01:09

Analyte Adsorption and Distribution

648
In certain chromatographic separations, solutes transfer between the mobile phase and the stationary phase via sorption, which typically refers to the process of adsorption. For many chromatographic systems, the sorption process often depends on the polarity of the compounds—an expression of the overall dipole moment within the molecule. During the separation process, there is competition between the solute and solvent for adsorption to the stationary phase. Highly polar compounds and...
648
Ionic Crystal Structures02:42

Ionic Crystal Structures

14.3K
Ionic crystals consist of two or more different kinds of ions that usually have different sizes. The packing of these ions into a crystal structure is more complex than the packing of metal atoms that are the same size.
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
14.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distribution coefficient prediction using multimodal machine learning based on soil adsorption factors, XRF, and XRD spectrum data.

Journal of hazardous materials·2024
Same author

Evaluation of derived concentration guideline levels reflecting the site-specific data for the soil of the Korea research reactor unit 1 and 2.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine·2024
Same author

Magnetic hierarchical titanium ferrocyanide for the highly efficient and selective removal of radioactive cesium from water.

Chemosphere·2024
Same author

Enhanced removal of cesium from hydrobiotite using polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-based nickel ferrocyanide beads.

Journal of hazardous materials·2023
Same author

Application of polyethylenimine-coated magnetic nanocomposites for the selective separation of Cs-enriched clay particles from radioactive soil.

RSC advances·2022
Same author

Stabilizing decontamination foam using surface-modified silica nanoparticles containing chemical reagent: foam stability, structures, and dispersion properties.

RSC advances·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Synthesis of Zeolites Using the ADOR Assembly-Disassembly-Organization-Reassembly Route
08:26

Synthesis of Zeolites Using the ADOR Assembly-Disassembly-Organization-Reassembly Route

Published on: April 3, 2016

13.3K

A comparative study on the Cs adsorption/desorption and structural changes in different clay minerals.

In-Ho Yoon1, Sang-Ho Lee2, Ilgook Kim3

  • 1Decommissioning Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 989-111, Daedeok-Daero, Yuseong-Gu, Daejeon, 34057, Republic of Korea. ihyoon@kaeri.re.kr.

Environmental Science and Pollution Research International
|March 13, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Cesium (Cs) adsorption on clay minerals like illite, hydrobiotite, and montmorillonite shows low desorption efficiency with ion exchangers. This is due to collapsed interlayers and strong Cs bonding, hindering removal.

Keywords:
AdsorptionCesiumClayDesorptionExtended X-ray absorption fine structureInterlayer

More Related Videos

Experimental Study of the Relationship Between Particle Size and Methane Sorption Capacity in Shale
07:23

Experimental Study of the Relationship Between Particle Size and Methane Sorption Capacity in Shale

Published on: August 2, 2018

7.5K
Deposition of Porous Sorbents on Fabric Supports
05:58

Deposition of Porous Sorbents on Fabric Supports

Published on: June 12, 2018

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Synthesis of Zeolites Using the ADOR Assembly-Disassembly-Organization-Reassembly Route
08:26

Synthesis of Zeolites Using the ADOR Assembly-Disassembly-Organization-Reassembly Route

Published on: April 3, 2016

13.3K
Experimental Study of the Relationship Between Particle Size and Methane Sorption Capacity in Shale
07:23

Experimental Study of the Relationship Between Particle Size and Methane Sorption Capacity in Shale

Published on: August 2, 2018

7.5K
Deposition of Porous Sorbents on Fabric Supports
05:58

Deposition of Porous Sorbents on Fabric Supports

Published on: June 12, 2018

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Geochemistry
  • Mineralogy
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Clay minerals play a crucial role in radionuclide retention in the environment.
  • Understanding cesium (Cs) adsorption and desorption mechanisms in 2:1 clay minerals is vital for nuclear waste management and environmental remediation.
  • Previous studies highlight the complexity of Cs interaction with clay mineral structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate structural changes in illite, hydrobiotite, and montmorillonite after Cs adsorption.
  • To elucidate the reasons for low Cs desorption efficiency from these clay minerals using ion exchangers.
  • To compare the effectiveness of different desorption methods for Cs-loaded clays.

Main Methods:

  • Batch adsorption experiments were conducted to analyze adsorption characteristics.
  • X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS) analyses were employed to study structural changes.
  • Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), maximum adsorption isotherms (Qmax), and radiocesium interception potential (RIP) were measured.
  • Desorption efficiency was evaluated using NaCl ion exchange and chelation with oxalic acid.

Main Results:

  • Illite exhibited high Cs selectivity despite low CEC, indicated by a high RIP/CEC ratio.
  • Cs desorption efficiency with NaCl ion exchange was highest for illite (74.3%), followed by hydrobiotite (45.5%) and montmorillonite (30.3%).
  • XRD and EXAFS analyses revealed that collapsed interlayers and strong bonding in frayed edge sites (FESs) limited Cs desorption, particularly after ion exchange involving divalent cations.
  • Chelation desorption with oxalic acid significantly enhanced Cs removal from hydrobiotite (98%) and montmorillonite (85.26%).

Conclusions:

  • Low Cs desorption efficiency from clays using ion exchangers is primarily caused by the collapse of interlayers due to cation exchange, trapping Cs.
  • The structural integrity of interlayers and the nature of Cs binding sites (planar vs. interlayer vs. FESs) significantly influence desorption.
  • Oxalic acid offers a more effective method for desorbing Cs from collapsed clay interlayers compared to simple ion exchange.