Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Introduction01:05

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Introduction

It is far more common for collisions to occur in two dimensions; that is, the initial velocity vectors are neither parallel nor antiparallel to each other. Let's see what complications arise from this. The first idea is that momentum is a vector. Like all vectors, it can be expressed as a sum of perpendicular components (usually, though not always, an x-component and a y-component, and a z-component if necessary). Thus, when the statement of conservation of momentum is written for a problem,...
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving01:06

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving

In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sympathetic nervous system-mediated fibro-adipogenic progenitor mobilization drives stroke-related sarcopenia.

Cell discovery·2026
Same author

Camrelizumab, a patinib and radiotherapy in locally advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 2 study.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

<i>Akkermansia muciniphila</i> Alleviates <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>-Exacerbated Alcoholic Liver Injury by Modulating Gut Microbiota and Barrier Function.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Machine learning-enabled discrimination of tetracycline antibiotics by synergistic inner filter effect and antenna effect in Eu<sup>3+</sup>-functionalized silver nanoclusters.

Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy·2026
Same author

Preparation and pharmacological study of <i>Cnidium monnieri</i> volatile oil cream.

Biomedical reports·2026
Same author

Age-stratified Discrepancy Between Expectations and Satisfaction in Facial Cosmetic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.3K

LiDAR Dynamic Target Detection Based on Multidimensional Features.

Aigong Xu1, Jiaxin Gao1, Xin Sui1

  • 1School of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|March 13, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel multidimensional feature method for LiDAR dynamic target detection, improving accuracy and efficiency without complex pre-processing. The new approach achieves a 92.41% correct detection rate for dynamic targets.

Keywords:
Boyer–Moore votingICPLiDAR dynamic target detectionRANSACSpearman’s rank correlation coefficientXGBoostfeature screeningsliding window

More Related Videos

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
07:14

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar

Published on: May 1, 2018

7.8K
Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
08:08

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

Published on: March 6, 2019

5.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles
11:54

Microfluidic Platform with Multiplexed Electronic Detection for Spatial Tracking of Particles

Published on: March 13, 2017

9.3K
Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
07:14

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar

Published on: May 1, 2018

7.8K
Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
08:08

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

Published on: March 6, 2019

5.2K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics and Autonomous Systems
  • Computer Vision
  • Sensor Fusion

Background:

  • Traditional LiDAR dynamic target detection methods often rely on heuristic thresholding or supplementary data, limiting their robustness and efficiency.
  • Existing approaches struggle with accurate point cloud cluster pairing across adjacent frames, hindering reliable motion state evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an innovative LiDAR dynamic target detection method that overcomes the limitations of existing techniques by utilizing multidimensional features.
  • To enhance the precision and efficiency of dynamic target detection in LiDAR data through advanced algorithms for point cloud registration and classification.

Main Methods:

  • A double registration algorithm (ICP, RANSAC) for precise point cloud cluster pairing between adjacent frames.
  • Development of a classification feature system using XGBoost, optimized by a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient-bidirectional search for dimensionality reduction.
  • A double Boyer-Moore voting-sliding window algorithm for refining detection accuracy after initial XGBoost classification.

Main Results:

  • Achieved a 92.41% correct detection rate for dynamic LiDAR targets.
  • Maintained a low static target error detection rate of 1.43%.
  • Demonstrated high detection efficiency with a processing time of 0.0299 seconds per frame.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed multidimensional feature-based method significantly improves LiDAR dynamic target detection accuracy and efficiency.
  • The novel approach offers a robust and automated solution, outperforming existing open-source comparative methods.
  • This work provides a valuable advancement for autonomous systems requiring reliable real-time dynamic object recognition.