A contemporary comparison of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma
- Edouard Nicaise 1, Adam S Feldman 2, Andrew Gusev 1, Alice Yu 3, Naren Nimmagadda 4, Matthew F Wszolek 1, Francis McGovern 1, Michael L Blute 1, Douglas M Dahl 1
- 1Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street GRB 1102, 02114, Boston, MA, USA.
- 2Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street GRB 1102, 02114, Boston, MA, USA. afeldman@partners.org.
- 3Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
- 4The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- 0Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street GRB 1102, 02114, Boston, MA, USA.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) offers comparable oncologic outcomes to open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). LPN demonstrates advantages in reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications.
Area Of Science
- Urology
- Surgical Oncology
- Nephrology
Background
- Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common malignancy.
- Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the standard treatment for localized RCC, preserving renal function.
- Open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) are established surgical techniques for RCC.
Purpose Of The Study
- To compare surgical and oncologic outcomes between OPN and LPN for RCC treatment.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive versus traditional open partial nephrectomy.
Main Methods
- Retrospective analysis of an institutional RCC database (1997-2018).
- Inclusion of patients who underwent partial nephrectomy (PN) for RCC.
- Comparison of pre/peri/post-operative parameters, pathological outcomes, and recurrence rates between OPN and LPN cohorts.
Main Results
- LPN was associated with significantly lower estimated blood loss (EBL), shorter length of stay, and fewer overall complications compared to OPN.
- Surgical time was longer for OPN, while ischemia time was longer for LPN.
- No significant differences were observed in margin involvement, high-grade complications, local recurrence rates, or post-operative renal function between the two techniques.
- Fewer LPN patients developed distant metastases.
Conclusions
- Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) provides equivalent long-term oncologic control compared to open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
- LPN offers significant advantages including reduced blood loss, shorter hospitalization, and a lower risk of overall complications.
- Both OPN and LPN preserve renal function effectively, with no significant post-operative differences observed.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

