Population-based surveillance for birth defects potentially related to Zika virus infection including 3-year

Katharine H McVeigh1, Tenzin Tseyang1, Mary-Elizabeth Vachon1

  • 1Division of Family and Child Health, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York, USA.

Birth Defects Research
|March 13, 2024
PubMed

Insights

New York City infants born in 2016 showed a low prevalence of birth defects potentially linked to Zika virus. Early Intervention Program referrals varied by maternal marital status and origin.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • The 2015-2017 Zika virus outbreak prompted New York City (NYC) to monitor infants for potential congenital Zika virus-related birth defects.
  • This initiative aimed to identify and track infants exhibiting symptoms associated with the virus.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize birth defects potentially related to congenital Zika virus infection in NYC infants born in 2016.
  • To compare these infants with the general NYC birth population.
  • To monitor mortality and Early Intervention Program (EIP) utilization up to age 2.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized administrative data matching to identify infants meeting screening criteria for Zika-related birth defects.
  • Analyzed birth characteristics, mortality data, and EIP referral rates.
  • Compared outcomes for infants meeting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) case definition with non-cases and the general birth cohort.

Main Results:

  • Out of 120,367 infants born in 2016, 463 met screening criteria, and 155 met the CDC case definition (1.3 per 1000 births).
  • Post-neonatal mortality was 7.7% for cases and 5.2% for non-cases.
  • Lower odds of EIP referral were observed for children of married mothers and for non-cases whose mothers were from Latin America and the Caribbean.

Conclusions:

  • The prevalence of birth defects potentially linked to congenital Zika virus in NYC was comparable to regions without local transmission.
  • Congenital Zika virus infection may have been present in screened infants who did not meet the formal case definition.
Abstract