Coccidioides Serologic Screening Practices in Individuals With Rheumatic and Autoimmune Diseases

Debbie L Wilson1, Shubha Kollampare2, C Kent Kwoh3

  • 1University of Florida, Gainesville.

ACR Open Rheumatology
|March 13, 2024
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Coccidioides screening rates were low for Medicare patients starting immunosuppressants in endemic areas. Improved adherence to screening guidelines is needed for patients on biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs).

Area of Science:

  • Rheumatology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Coccidioides spp. infections pose a risk to immunocompromised patients.
  • Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs), conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), and corticosteroids increase infection risk.
  • Pre-treatment screening for Coccidioides is recommended in endemic areas.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate Coccidioides serologic screening rates before initiating b/tsDMARDs, csDMARDs, and/or noninhaled corticosteroids.
  • To assess screening practices among Medicare beneficiaries in Coccidioides-endemic regions of the US.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study using 2011-2016 US Medicare claims data.
  • Included beneficiaries with rheumatic/autoimmune diseases in Arizona, California, and Texas.
  • Estimated prior-year serologic screening incidence before initiating b/tsDMARDs, csDMARDs, or noninhaled corticosteroids.

Main Results:

  • In Arizona (2012-2016), screening rates were 20.1% before b/tsDMARDs, 8.1% before csDMARDs, and 6.9% before corticosteroids.
  • Screening rates were significantly lower in California (e.g., 2.8% for b/tsDMARDs) and undetected in Texas.
  • Adjusted screening rates for b/tsDMARDs in Arizona increased from 14.5% in 2012 to 26.7% in 2016.

Conclusions:

  • Coccidioides serologic screening rates were low among Medicare beneficiaries on immunosuppressants in endemic regions (2012-2016).
  • Significant geographic disparities in screening rates were observed.
  • Alignment between screening recommendations and clinical practice is necessary.