Assessing Effectiveness of Physical Therapy Clinical Education Site Visits: Clinical Instructor and Student
Michele Shelly Lewis1,2,3, Melissa Lesser1,2,3, Eric Folkins1,2,3
1Michele (Shelly) Lewis is a Board-Certified Geriatric Clinical Specialist, co-director of clinical education, and associate professor in the department of physical therapy at Thomas Jefferson University, 901 Walnut St, Room 502, Philadelphia PA 19107 ( Shelly.Lewis2@Jefferson.edu ). Please address all correspondence to Michele (Shelly) Lewis.
Introduction:
Video, phone, or in-person site visits are used to assess clinical education in entry-level physical therapy education programs. The perspectives of students and clinical instructors (CIs) related to site visits were examined in this article using 2 consecutive surveys. The first included items related to in-person and phone call site visits. The second added video calls. The research purpose was to assess the CI and student perspectives on the effectiveness of site visits and explore the differences between in-person, video, and phone visits.
Review Of Literature:
Published literature about the effectiveness of site visits is scarce. Two recent articles explored the director of clinical education and student perspectives of site visits. Future research concentrating on the clinician perspective of site visits was recommended.
Subjects:
A convenience sample of 104 CIs and 97 doctor of physical therapy students were recruited by email for the 2 surveys.
Methods:
A mixed-methods, triangular, validating, quantitative data model was used. Respondents answered open-ended questions and rated items on 5-point Likert scales. Descriptive and chi-square statistics were calculated, and themes were developed using qualitative analysis.
Results:
No significant difference was found in preference of site visit method between students and CIs. CIs rated the effectiveness of site visits similarly for all methods. Students rated in-person site visits as the most effective in the first survey and video calls as the most effective in the second survey. Qualitative analysis showed that CIs and students preferred in-person visits when the student was struggling. Considering closed-ended and open-ended questions on both surveys, CIs and students would rather meet individually with the faculty member.
Discussion And Conclusion:
The results of this study suggest that any type of site visit can be effective; in-person visits should be considered when students are struggling, and the site visitor should meet privately with the student and CI.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:20Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
01:25Elements Crucial for Effective Psychotherapy
The Therapeutic Alliance
The therapeutic alliance refers to the relationship between the therapist and the client. The alliance strengthens when the therapist and the client engage in a nurturing, supportive, trusting, empathetic, and respectful relationship, improving therapeutic outcomes. Therapists must monitor this relationship...
01:15Nursing Evaluation
01:21Methods of Documentation III: PIE
01:05Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...