Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Elementary school-aged children's perceptions of academic dishonesty: Definitions and moral evaluations of cheating
Shanna Williams1, Krupali Patel1, Matthew Baker1
1Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1Y2, Canada.
Abstract:
A total of 76 children (Mage = 9 years 5 months, SD = 2.22 years) participated in a structured interview about their experiences with and knowledge of academic dishonesty. Overall, 27% of the sample reported having cheated in school. Most of these children were 10 to 13 years old, and the most prevalent form of cheating behavior reported was using forbidden materials during a test. Children's age group was a significant positive predictor of their reported cheating history; however, no significant difference was found between children's gender and engagement with cheating. Children's moral evaluations of cheating did not predict their reported cheating history, nor did children's parents' cheating history. Vignette type (cheating vs. non-cheating), age group, and the interaction between vignette type and age group were significant predictors of children's ability to accurately identify behaviors that constitute cheating. Children rated cheating behaviors as significantly less moral than non-cheating behaviors. Overall, the current results provide insight into what forms of cheating behavior children engage in at the elementary school-age level.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
Bullying
Conduct Disorder
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Self-Discrepancy Theory

