Development of an Algorithm for Correct Placement of the Basal Electrode Contact in the Context of Anatomy-Based Cochlear Implantation: A Proof of Concept
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
Published on: January 17, 2025
Bjoern Spahn1, Johannes Voelker2, Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff2
1Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, spahn_b@ukw.de.
Background:
Correct individual tonotopic frequency stimulation of the cochlea plays an important role in the further development of anatomy-based cochlear implantation. In this context, frequency-specific fitting of the basal electrode contact with a normal insertion depth can be difficult since it is often placed in a frequency range higher than 10 kHz, and current audio processors only stimulate for frequencies up to 8.5 kHz due to microphone characteristics. This results in a mismatch of the high frequencies. Therefore, this study represents a proof of concept for a tonotopic correct insertion and aims to develop an algorithm for a placement of the basal electrode below 8.5 kHz in an experimental setting.
Methods:
Pre- and postoperative flat-panel volume CT scans with secondary reconstructions were performed on 10 human temporal bone specimens. The desired frequency location for the most basal electrode contact was set at 8.25 kHz. The distance from the round window to the position where the basal electrode contact was intended to be located was calculated preoperatively using 3D-curved multiplanar reconstruction and a newly developed mathematical approach. A specially designed cochlear implant electrode array with customized markers imprinted on the silicone of the electrode array was inserted in all specimens based on the individually calculated insertion depths. All postoperative measurements were additionally validated using otological planning software.
Results:
Positioning of the basal electrode contact was reached with only a small mean deviation of 37 ± 399 Hz and 0.06 ± 0.37 mm from the planned frequency of 8.25 kHz. The mean rotation angle up to the basal electrode contact was 51 ± 5°. In addition, the inserted electrode array adequately covered the apical regions of the cochleae.
Conclusion:
Using this algorithm, it was possible to position the basal electrode array contact in an area of the cochlea that could be correctly stimulated by the existing speech processors in the context of tonotopic correct fitting.
