Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
Published on: August 28, 2021
Equating and linking Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-item questionnaire and 36-item
Jean-Benoit Hardouin1, Joel Coste2, Alain Leplège3
1INSERM UMR 1246, SPHERE, Methods in Patient- Centred Outcomes and Health Research, Nantes and Tours Universities, Nantes, France; CHU Nantes, Public Health Department, Methodology and Biostatistics Unit, Nantes, France.
This study developed a simple method to link scores between the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-item questionnaire (PROMIS-29). This facilitates cross-study comparisons of health outcomes in France.
Area of Science:
- Health Outcomes Research
- Psychometrics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- The 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-item questionnaire (PROMIS-29) are widely used patient-reported outcome measures.
- Comparing results across studies using different instruments can be challenging due to differing scoring metrics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a practical methodology for equating or linking equivalent domains of the SF-36 and PROMIS-29.
- To utilize the Rasch framework for accurate score comparison between the two health surveys.
- To enable seamless data integration and analysis across studies employing either the SF-36 or PROMIS-29.
Main Methods:
- A Partial Credit Model was applied to common items from the SF-36 and PROMIS-29 within each domain.
- Data from 1501 French individuals representative of the general population were used for calibration.
- Items from both questionnaires were calibrated onto a common metric using Rasch modeling.
Main Results:
- Successful equating or linking was achieved for six of seven PROMIS-29 scales and five of six SF-36 subscales.
- Correspondence tables with 95% confidence intervals were generated for each equated domain.
- A user-friendly Stata macro was created to automate the equating process.
Conclusions:
- The developed methodology simplifies score comparison between SF-36 and PROMIS-29 in France.
- The Rasch-based equating process is practical, easily implementable, and applicable to other instruments and populations.
- This facilitates more robust meta-analyses and comparative effectiveness research.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ratio Level of Measurement
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Reliability and Validity
Nominal Level of Measurement
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal...
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Ordinal Level of Measurement
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...

