Gram-negative bacterial colonizations before bilateral lung transplant. The impact of 'targeted' versus 'standard' surgical prophylaxis

  • 0Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Targeted prophylaxis did not prevent Gram-negative infections after lung transplant (LT) in patients already colonized by these bacteria. This study suggests standard prophylaxis may be as effective in reducing postoperative multi-drug resistant infections.

Area Of Science

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Transplant Surgery
  • Antimicrobial Stewardship

Background

  • Infections are a leading cause of mortality post-lung transplant (LT).
  • The efficacy of targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis for Gram-negative (GN) bacterial colonization in LT recipients remains uncertain.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis compared to standard prophylaxis in preventing postoperative Gram-negative bacterial infections in lung transplant recipients with pre-existing GN colonization.

Main Methods

  • Retrospective analysis of bilateral LT recipients at the University Hospital of Padua (2016-2023).
  • Patients with pre-existing GN bacterial isolations were divided into 'standard' and 'targeted' antimicrobial prophylaxis groups.
  • Outcomes assessed included postoperative multi-drug resistant (MDR) GN bacteria isolation and infection rates.

Main Results

  • Among 46 enrolled LT recipients, 22 received targeted and 24 received standard prophylaxis.
  • Postoperative isolation of MDR GN bacteria occurred in 65% of patients, with no significant difference between prophylaxis groups (p=0.364).
  • The prevalence of postoperative infections due to MDR GN bacteria was 50%, with a significantly higher rate in the targeted prophylaxis group (11 vs. 4 patients, p=0.027).

Conclusions

  • Targeted prophylaxis in LT recipients with pre-existing GN colonization did not appear to prevent postoperative MDR GN infections.
  • The findings suggest that standard prophylaxis may be equally or more effective than targeted prophylaxis in this patient population.