Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
Published on: April 12, 2024
Association Between Intensity and Timing of Specialty Palliative Care and Hospice Exposure With Quality of
Susan E Wang1, Wendolyn S Gozansky2,3, Claudia Steiner2,3,4
1The Permanente Federation, Oakland, California, USA.
Abstract:
Gaps remain in our understanding of the intensity and timing of specialty palliative care (SPC) exposure on end-of-life (EOL) outcomes. Examine the association between intensity and timing of SPC and hospice (HO) exposure on EOL care outcomes. Data for this cohort study were drawn from 2021 adult decedents from Kaiser Permanente Southern California and Colorado (n = 26,251). Caregivers of a decedent subgroup completed a postdeath care experience survey from July to August 2022 (n = 424). SPC intensity (inpatient, outpatient, and home-based) and HO exposure in the five years before death were categorized as: (1) No SPC or HO; (2) SPC-only; (3) HO-only; and (4) SPC-HO. Timing of SPC exposure (<90 or 90+ days) before death was stratified by HO enrollment. Death in the hospital and potentially burdensome treatments in the last 14 days of life were extracted from electronic medical records (EMRs) and claims. EOL care experience was obtained from the caregiver survey. Among the EMR cohort, exposure to SPC and HO were: No SPC or HO (38%), SPC-only (14%; of whom, 55% received inpatient SPC only), HO-only (20%), and SPC-HO (28%). For decedents who did not enroll in HO, exposure to SPC 90+ days versus <90 days before death was associated with lower risk of receiving potentially burdensome treatments (adjusted relative risk, aRR: 0.69 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.62-0.76], p < 0.001) and 23% lower risk of dying in the hospital (aRR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.73-0.81], p < 0.001). Caregivers of patients in the HO-only (aRR: 1.27 [95% CI: 0.98-1.63], p = 0.07) and SPC-HO cohorts (aRR: 1.19 [95% CI: 0.93-1.52], p = 0.18) tended to report more positive care experience compared to the no SPC or HO cohort. Earlier exposure to SPC was important in reducing potentially burdensome treatments and death in the hospital for decedents who did not enroll in HO. Increasing availability and access to community-based SPC is needed.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:14A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: January 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Continuing Care
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Cancer Survival Analysis
Ethical Dilemmas II
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...