Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026
Sex Stratified Neuronal Cultures to Study Ischemic Cell Death Pathways
Published on: December 9, 2013
Differences in Receipt of Neurologist Evaluation During Hospitalization for Ischemic Stroke by Race, Sex, Age, and
Stephanie Hart1, George Howard1, Doyle Cummings1
1From the School of Nursing (S.H.), and Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute (S.H.), Duke University, Durham, NC; School of Public Health (G.H., V.J.H.), University of Alabama at Birmingham; Department of Public Health (D.C.), Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Department of Neurology (K.C.A.), SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; and College of Nursing (P.R.), East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
Background And Objectives:
Improving access to health care providers with clinical expertise in stroke care may influence the use of recommended strategies for reducing disparities in quality of care. Few studies have examined differences in the receipt of evaluation by neurologists during the hospital stay. We examined the proportion of individuals hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke who received evaluation by a neurologist during the hospital stay and characterized differences in receipt of neurologist evaluation by race (Black vs White), sex, age, and study region (Stroke Belt residence vs other) among those experiencing a stroke who were participating in a national cohort study.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study was conducted using medical record data abstracted from 1,042 participants enrolled in the national Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke cohort study (2003-2007) who experienced an adjudicated ischemic stroke between 2003 and 2016. Participants with a history of stroke before baseline, in-hospital death, hospice discharge following their stroke, or incomplete records were excluded resulting in 839 cases. Differences were assessed using modified Poisson regression adjusting for participant-level and hospital-level factors.
Results:
Of the 839 incident strokes, 722 (86%) received evaluation by a neurologist during the hospital stay. There were no significant differences by age, race, or sex, yet Stroke Belt residents and those receiving care in rural hospitals were significantly less likely to receive neurologist evaluation compared with non-Stroke Belt residents (relative risk [RR] 0.95; 95% CI 0.90-1.01) and participants receiving care in urban hospitals (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.86). Participants with a greater level of poststroke functional impairment (modified Rankin scale) and those with a greater number of risk factors were more likely to receive neurologist evaluation compared with those with lower levels of poststroke functional impairment (RR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.06) and fewer risk factors (RR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.04).
Discussion:
While differences in access to neurologists during the hospital stay were partially explained by patient need in our study, there were also significant differences in access by region and urban-rural hospital status. Ensuring access to neurologists during the hospital stay in such settings may require policy-level and/or system-level changes.
