Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

09:03
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
Published on: February 29, 2020
5.8K
Can Media Literacy Intervention Improve Fake News Credibility Assessment? A Meta-Analysis
Chang Lu1,2, Bo Hu1, Meng-Meng Bao3
1School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking
|March 14, 2024
Summary
Media literacy interventions significantly improve the ability to assess fake news credibility. Gaming interventions proved most effective, highlighting their potential in combating misinformation.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Media Studies
- Education
Background:
- Fake news negatively impacts decision-making, political processes, and societal trends.
- Effective assessment of fake news is crucial for mitigating its harmful effects.
- Previous research on media literacy interventions for fake news assessment yielded inconsistent results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically analyze the effectiveness of media literacy interventions in improving fake news credibility assessments.
- To identify factors influencing the success of these interventions.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis was conducted on 33 independent studies.
- Data from 36,256 participants were included.
- Intervention effects on fake news credibility assessment were statistically examined.
Main Results:
- Media literacy interventions significantly enhanced fake news credibility assessments (Hedges' g = 0.53).
- Gaming interventions demonstrated the highest effectiveness among different intervention types.
- Intervention channel, measurement, and participant characteristics did not significantly affect outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Media literacy interventions are effective in improving individuals' ability to discern fake news.
- Gaming-based approaches show particular promise for enhancing fake news assessment skills.
- The positive effects of these interventions are robust across various contexts and participant demographics.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
False Memories
88
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
88
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
49.9K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
49.9K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K

