Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tracking Rumination as a Stable Habit (TRASH); Scale Modification and Convergent Validity in a Clinical Sample of Youth With a History of Depression.

Psychological reports·2026
Same author

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Detecting expertise in decision making under pressure: a virtual reality assessment environment and empirical evaluation.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Attenuated cognitive control network connectivity as a mechanism in mother-daughter intergenerational transmission of depression: a preliminary study.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Adaptable Automation Transparency: Should Humans Be Provided Flexibility to Self-Select Transparency Information?

Human factors·2025
Same author

The impacts of expertise, conflict, and scientific literacy on trust and belief in scientific disagreements.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Planned missingness in intensive longitudinal studies: Extensions and comparisons of multiform designs.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Are 7-point Likert scales preferable to 5-point scales in language research?

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Generative psychometrics via AI-GENIE: Automatic item generation and validation with network-integrated evaluation.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Exploring psychological tradeoffs: Developing and demonstrating an R Shiny app for Pareto optimization.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

The performance of Bayesian fit measures in detecting misspecified multilevel structural equation modeling.

Behavior research methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.1K

A guide to measuring expert performance in forensic pattern matching.

Samuel G Robson1,2, Rachel A Searston3, Matthew B Thompson4,5

  • 1School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. sam.robson@unsw.edu.au.

Behavior Research Methods
|March 15, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Forensic science decisions are often binary, but measurement choices significantly impact performance conclusions. Researchers must carefully select tasks, materials, and models for accurate forensic examiner performance assessment.

Keywords:
Decision-makingExpertiseFingerprintsForensic pattern matchingForensic scienceProficiency testsSignal detection

More Related Videos

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

446
Fabrication and Implementation of a Reference-Free Traction Force Microscopy Platform
08:10

Fabrication and Implementation of a Reference-Free Traction Force Microscopy Platform

Published on: October 6, 2019

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.1K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

446
Fabrication and Implementation of a Reference-Free Traction Force Microscopy Platform
08:10

Fabrication and Implementation of a Reference-Free Traction Force Microscopy Platform

Published on: October 6, 2019

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Analysis

Background:

  • Forensic science decisions are frequently binary (e.g., match/no match).
  • Signal detection theory (SDT) is commonly used to quantify expert performance in these tasks.
  • Existing research may be influenced by methodological choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate how research design and measurement choices affect conclusions about forensic examiner performance.
  • To introduce and apply various performance models to forensic decisions.
  • To highlight factors influencing the interpretation of expert performance.

Main Methods:

  • Applied multiple performance models (proportion correct, diagnosticity ratio, SDT measures) to forensic decisions.
  • Utilized resampling methods on expert and novice fingerprint comparison data.
  • Analyzed the impact of task, case materials, and measurement model selection.

Main Results:

  • Measurement and design choices can dramatically alter conclusions about forensic examiner performance.
  • Factors like response bias, prevalence, and trial design influence interpretation.
  • Different models yield varying results for the same dataset.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized experimental designs are crucial for reliable forensic performance evaluation.
  • Recommendations include equal same/different source trials, separate inconclusive responses, control groups, and sufficient trials.
  • Careful consideration of methodology is essential for accurate diagnostic accuracy studies in forensics.